Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False


PD;1180730 Wrote:
On Jul 6, 10:22*am, Strich 9 Strich.9.2b6b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:-
PD;1180145 Wrote:


-
On Jul 5, 3:29*pm, Strich 9 Strich.9.2b5b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
-
--
-
PROP 5: Since the 2.26us in the muon REST frame is EXACTLY EQUAL
(barring the trivial effects of a gravitational field) to the 2.26us
in
the earth REST frame, then we have a contradiction, since 700m is
not
equal to 7000m.-
-
-True.--
-
No, false.
-
*Explanation will be provided on demand.--
-
Consider it demanded.
-
*The reason nobody has
chosen this option as false--
-
I have several times.
-
is because *no textbook on relativity
contradicts this statement*.--
-
Your library must be thin.
-
*The keen physicist will see no quibble
here.--
-
We'll see.
-
--
-
Of course, if we assume that time dilation and length contraction
are
merely -*perceptive distortions*- in the eyes of the observer, as
opposed to -*actual physical*- phenomena, then no contradiction
arises.-
-
Comments and questions are welcome. *Thank you.-
-
--
Strich 9--

since you bragged about your bigger library, why don't you quote a
single source disputing the basic idea in proposition 5 and show us
that there is a brain backing up that tongue ?! *or is it all hot
air?
i thought so...-

Sure. If you've not read Taylor and Wheeler's Spacetime Physics, or
Penrose's Road to Reality or Robert Geroch's General Relativity from A
to B, I suggest you start there.

There you will find the statement that between two physical events
(and you do know what an "event" is, don't you?), two different
inertial observers will measure different elapsed times. That is,
between two physical events A and B, what is 2.26 us in one frame will
be 4.18 us in another frame. Or conversely, what pair of events that
are 2.26 us in one frame will not be the same pair of events that are
separated by 2.26 us in another frame.

-

--
Strich 9-


Your stupidity is mind boggling. One does not need to consult a
textbook to know that two different observers will obtain different
measures of the same event. Even a caveman knows that if you are 1
mile from caveman A and 2 miles from caveman B, the latter will see you
much smaller (and perhaps appropriately so) than the former.

Now, a caveman also knows that his measuring rod stays invariant
(barring any dirty puns) in his reference frame, a concept you also
seem unable to grasp. Perhaps you need to use a more reliable rod.

Propositon 5 states that when a resting clock ticks of 2.26
microseconds in one frame, this is EQUAL to a 2.26 microsecond interval
ticked off by another resting clock in a different frame. And for that,
you'd be hard pressed to find a dissenting textbook or physics
authority. And should know why that would be so.




--
Strich 9
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are you an idealist? (was: Einsteins logic)
    ... > I KNOW that the LET current rest frame is the original rest frame. ... theory of relativity. ... > better than modern physics has. ... But you are correct, the scientific method requires ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is physics a science?
    ... Therefore physics is a knowledge ... different than what it is in another reference frame. ... electrodynamics book. ... time and measurement theory Einstein broke a cardinal rule. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... Cartesian coordinates S to represent the frame of reference of the ... where it is reflected by the mirror. ... Nobody knows the essence of the physics they are talking ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Why SR? (was: Source Independency of Light Speed Without an Aether???????)
    ... the longer wavelength of that wave (in your frame of reference) ... to the wave changes. ... physicists changed the nature of physics and declared that a physics ... satisfy the principle of relativity in its simple form using the Galilei ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question:Lorentz interpretation of SR vs to Einsteins
    ... My understanding of the history of SR is that Lorenz ... > Lorenz treated them as purely a mathematical convenience, while Einstein ... > mechanism that actually follows from classical physics: ... existence of an aether frame and of a slow ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)