Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: jem <xxx@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:40:28 -0400
PD wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:13 am, Shubee <e.Shu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Jul 7, 9:39 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd be interested in your telling me how you think kinetic energy isObjects like kinetic energy, relativistic mass and 3-momentum, are
driven by the invariants of the geometry of spacetime.
pretensors and therefore belong to the set of geometric invariants
that Klein had in mind.
Umm... no. Nice jargon-flinging, though. Might help if you had the
foggiest idea of the meaning of the terms when you fling them..
I'm going to have to stand up for Shooby here, PD. I have *never* known Shooby to use a term he didn't have a foggy idea of.
No need to thank me for the kind words, Shooby.
.
- References:
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Shubee
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Next by Date: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Next by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Index(es):