Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: "Pmb" <physics_world@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:58:40 -0400
"Juan R. González-Álvarez" <juanREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:pan.2008.07.10.17.56.09@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dono wrote on Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:52:26 -0700:
No one confused the hamiltonian with the lagrangian (not even you,
(...)
Eric confounded both, wrote H = L in previous message and did incorrect
claims about a blog article. You also did :-)
Eric isn't a physicist so don't expect him to be precise as one.
The Hamiltonian is identical to Jacobi's integral (sometimes called the
"energy function") in value. The former is expressed in terms of position
and canonical momentum whereas the later is expressed in terms of position
(q) and its first time derivative (dq/dt)
Pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- References:
- massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Dono
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Dono
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- massless or massive photon?
- Prev by Date: Re: massless or massive photon?
- Next by Date: Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False
- Previous by thread: Re: massless or massive photon?
- Next by thread: Re: massless or massive photon?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|