Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 15:03:13 +0200 (CEST)
Pmb wrote on Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:52:55 -0400:
Here's some more for you to laugh at Juan; F = ma was not due to Newton
as Dono seems to think. Its due to Euler. :) Newton's relation was F =
dp/dt which is precisely correct.
Even the wikipedia notices that! But Dono is well-known by being an
ignorant troll.
--
Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
http://canonicalscience.org
.
- References:
- massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Dono
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Dono
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Pmb
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Pmb
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Dono
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Pmb
- massless or massive photon?
- Prev by Date: Re: massless or massive photon?
- Next by Date: Re: massless or massive photon?
- Previous by thread: Re: massless or massive photon?
- Next by thread: Re: massless or massive photon?
- Index(es):