Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False


paparios@xxxxxxxxx;1184842 Wrote:
On 11 jul, 20:37, "Spaceman" space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:-
papar...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:-
"...?History also shows that nobody has ever developed a new and
useful theory without being familiar with the then-current theories
and experiments. That's why the idiots and crackpots around here are
so pathetic: if they truly wanted to make a contribution, they would
be seriously STUDYING the current theories and experimental record,
and trying to extend one or the other...?-

Why would you extend something that is based upon wrong things
such as multiple standards for time and distance?
That would not even be scientific, just like SR has taken most
of science into the joke worlds of "time travel","zero point energy",
"wormholes" and of course "singularities" and all sorts of stupid ass
**** that belongs much better in SciFi than in science.
:)

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman-

So what is your agenda then...just making noise?

Miguel Rios

Do not underestimate noise Miguel. Noise can generate long-lasting and
permanent effects, as opposed to the apparent but unreal effects of
relativity.

Our agenda is to disseminate the error of special relativity as
interpreted by Einstein (EI-SR) in the popular media and press. The
chance of having the -proof of an error in special relativity-
published in a physics peer reviewed journal is about as much as
Galileo had of having the Heliocentric theory published in a papal
encyclical.

The orthodoxy in physics have much to lose. First is their pride, for
having not seen the error in over a century. Second is their research
funding for experiments in relativity. Third is their profession since
there would be no need for relativists anymore. This may actually be
good for other physicists, as the money being diverted to fund
relativity research and faculty may well be spent on other branches of
physics.

The good news is that the first orthodox physicists to admit the error
will be viewed as visionary and can simply make the move to the more
robust branches of physics, while the last would be stuck in a sinking
ship.




--
Strich 9
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... physics ideas, ... rotation between yourself and the stars. ... I know that its common for people trying to state Mach's Principle so ... rather than "absolute relativity". ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... physics ideas, ... rotation between yourself and the stars. ... I know that its common for people trying to state Mach's Principle so ... rather than "absolute relativity". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • SR, curvature terms, and Realms of Validity
    ... >is a false theory of physics, while it may very well be ... Yep, people sometimes talk about SR's "realm of validity", but I don't ... It assumes that light is in no way affected by the presence or motion ... relativity, so that the total Doppler effect on a "gravitational" and ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... >> By thesame tokem since special relativity reduces to newtonian ... 2AB/= c to be a universal constant- the velocity of light in empty ... > interesting to hear why in physics things are what they are, ... > constant c and their dependence of Aether energy density u. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Article: A Century of Einstein
    ... >> By thesame tokem since special relativity reduces to newtonian ... 2AB/= c to be a universal constant- the velocity of light in empty ... > interesting to hear why in physics things are what they are, ... > constant c and their dependence of Aether energy density u. ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading