Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?

On Jul 12, 8:47 pm, Dono <sa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 12, 5:29 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip kookiness>

Sue,

You are all talk and no action, all you are good for is cobbling up
links to websites, you can't calculate jack***. You have no clue how
to put the things together.

I'll give you one more set of clues:

1. If you solve the equation of motion, you will get that T=sqrt(a/b).
You will need to find what are the physical entities a and b.
2. In another frame F', moving with constant speed V wrt F, T'=sqrt(a'/
b')
3. If you do your calculations correctly, you will also find out that

a'/b'=gamma^2*(a/b) ,

4. The above confirms that T'=gamma*T

Now, get busy, start calculating, I will not give you any more hints.

The calculation was offered to you.
If you insist on relativistic corrections just approximate
the peak speed of the disk for your gamma factor.

Say...100mm/sec for one of these little gems?
http://www.wkinsler.com/clocks/kundo1.jpg

Sue...




.

Quantcast