Experimental tests of "relativity".
- From: glird@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 13, 1:58 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The experimental support of SR in essentially all >non-gravitational contexts is solid and unassailable ...The experiments test the validity of the Lorentz Transformation
SR is one of the best-tested theories we have, >and within its domain of applicability there is not a >single reliable and reproducible experiment which
contradicts its predictions.
EQUATIONS; not the THEORY of Einstein. When you see that Einstein
never accurately derived those equations, and you understand them
well enough to realize that they don't fit his theory, you will know
that every experiment which validated these equations thereby proved
that STR is false. (If you want to understand these things read "A
Flower for Einstein" by Gerald Lebau.)
Cranks like Baird (and many others around here)Most physicists do not have a clue about what their equations
simply do not have a clue about how to do physics, >or what physics really is.
physically represent nor what reality really is. (Anyone who wants to
should read "The Anpheon" by Gerald Lebau.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
- Prev by Date: Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
- Next by Date: Re: Curious about the emission theory of light
- Previous by thread: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
- Next by thread: Re: Experimental tests of "relativity".
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
