Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.


"Uncle Ben" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:49c345b9-a636-49ff-a5b1-092d547f2de0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 14, 11:16 am, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Uncle Ben wrote:
On Jul 13, 11:27 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You see, the basic atomic clock actually has to use gravity
to get it's most accurate reading.
They actually have a "fountain" almost like a water fountain
only it is forcing a very tiny ball or atoms upward and it has to use
gravity to return down and be counted as one second.

If you actually take the silly thing and flip it upside down,
It is as good as any pendulum clock of yesteryear.
It simply won't work right.
Isn't that funny?
Want to read about it also.http://tf.nist.gov/cesium/fountain.htm

Check out the sentence that shows up just
above the graphic

So,
Everyone..
laugh at the time changing rate morons of relativity
that tell me the clock did not malfunction,
since .. they really are clueless about a simple
clock malfunction when g-forces are changed around
them.
LOL
Laugh loud and proud!
HA HA HAHA HA HAHA

Maybe if they yell at NIST enough and pay
them a pretty penny, NIST will remove that
factual point made on the website.
Or just maybe NIST will be smarter than them
and allow science to finally drop this time travel bull***.
:)

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

I guess all that stuff about cesium and state changes in the atoms is
a diversion, right?

A diversion about the fact that it is still subject to gravitational
effects
the same as any other mass in motion being counted such as a pendulum?
Yes..
It is a nice diversion.
:)

Do you think a tiny atom cluster falls differently than a billion atoms
in gravity?
Do you think the cesium atom is immune to gravity?

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



I'll go for one more round.
=====================

And then you'll *** off?
I'm curious.... why are you anti-physicists so stupid?



.

Quantcast