Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.

PD wrote:
On Jul 14, 12:37 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
PD wrote:
No, you're right. A straight beampipe starts at one elevation and
goes to a different one. But you missed what I just said. Particles
going through the same beampipe at *different* speeds get
*different* time dilations, even though they are going through the
*same* variation in the gravitational field.

The variation in the differential changes would of course make
different changes in any clock doing such speeds.

Please understand cause and effect. If you
have two objects that exhibit DIFFERENT effects and they are subject
to the SAME influence, then the influence cannot possibly be the
cause of the effect.

Different speeds, is not the "same influence" PD.

Yes, but you don't think that different speeds are what's responsible.
You think g-forces are responsible for time dilation.

G-force changes are what causes such. the speed will just cause
the g-force change to occur faster or slower.
If you move fast through different gravitational potentials,
you will simply get a higher rate of change.



Here you have different particles with different speeds but the *same*
variation in g-forces, and they have *different* time dilations.

You have different variations because you have different time frame
for each g-force potential change.


Please put the beer down and try to think coherently.

I don't drink, I think you need to put the hard stuff away,
or maybe whatever you are smoking or popping.

Different speeds are not the "same variation change"
And even relativity gets that right most of the time.
Usually refered to as "relative" mass.

Are you *sure* that's what it's called? Try again.

What do you think relative mass is called?


Right, but you don't think relativistic mass (an SR prediction) is
what's responsible. You think g-forces are.

the g-force changes are what causes the malfunction,
the speed changes going through different g-force changes
cause the variance in such malfunctions.
Sheesh PD.
I have explained this to you.
It is sad you still can't get such basics about clock
malfunctions.

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Apple II Disk Drive Question
    ... says that the maximum variation due to rotation speed and disk flutter ... that 4.7% below OR above 300 RPM is acceptable - no translation required ... range of rotation is speeds is about twice what I said, ... reading and writing drives, and I interpreted the quoted 4.7% figure as ...
    (comp.sys.apple2)
  • Re: Apple II Disk Drive Question
    ... says that the maximum variation due to rotation speed and disk flutter ... that 4.7% below OR above 300 RPM is acceptable - no translation required ... range of rotation is speeds is about twice what I said, ... reading and writing drives, and I interpreted the quoted 4.7% figure as ...
    (comp.sys.apple2)
  • Re: A silly fact about an atomic clock that relativist never want you to know.
    ... The variation in the differential changes would of course make ... Different speeds, is not the "same influence" PD. ... DIFFERENT time dilations. ... And even relativity gets that right most of the time. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: tire pressure does not significantly affect rolling resistance.
    ... As far as I know, a 1 mph wind is undetectable, but will have ... At about 1 mph, you won't see leaves rustling or smoke drifting: ... That works out to average speeds of 13.45 to 16.27 mph. ... and we still have a 0.8 mph variation. ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Re: Need Clarification on Throw/APAPP
    ... > I looked at the section in Marlow this morning. ... > plot plot of throw vs. cut angle and speed. ... I would have thought that a 10:1 variation in mu would ... used the cueball speeds you just quoted for the surface speeds ...
    (rec.sport.billiard)