Re: Finally, Special Relativity Is Proven False

"Strich 9" <Strich.9.2c29301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Strich.9.2c29301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The proposition of the Argument assumes that time dilation and length
contraction represent -*real physical changes*-. This leads to a
-*contradiction*-.

Whose argument and propositions are those? Some strawman's?


When you remove the reality of the relativistic changes and assume
that time dilation and length contraction are -*illusory *-, then the
*-contradiction disappears-*.

Perhaps. but you would still have the nagging little
problem of the fact that they are *measured* things.
You then have the difficulty of determining in what
sense measured things are not real.


You have proved EXACTLY my point that time dilation and length
contraction are only apparent changes and do not represent reality,
which is what the Argument is supposed to prove. Notice that your
rods and clocks kept EXACTLY the same measure and time whether they
were in motion or not.

Except as viewed from another frame of reference. And then
there's the small matter of the Twin Paradox where a moving
clock is brought back for comparison with a stay-at-home one.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... paper about the 'reality' of time dilation on clocks. ... Marcel Luttgens ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... paper about the 'reality' of time dilation on clocks. ... Marcel Luttgens ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv Proof of 40k BC Creation (READ ONLY)
    ... >> TIME DILATION not an SR time dilation. ... Humans were created 40K years ago (subjective reality). ... >> the age of Biblical Creation and the age of the Big Bang creation. ... credentials in Relativity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Universal Metasymmetry
    ... >> disatances as indicated by real appartus eg rulers and clocks. ... theory can not describe reality' or it is 'only a math contract so can not ... 'Place a particle at rest in an inertial frame. ... where's the input of that instrument and what signal ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GR ?
    ... >>> reality only the relationship between the ladder and door. ... >> And so does SR - which is why proper time is the only invariant time. ... The theory says the flying clocks ... >>> Yes as a physical fact. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)