Re: Question about relativity

paparios@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Another example is time dilation, which can be derived from the
constancy of the speed of light in all reference frames as follows:

Oh ya,
Here comes the joke that uses the ignorance of relativity to
prove the constant speed of light to all frames.
The old 1c+0.5c = 1c bull*** based crap.


First consider a train coach where you have a light clock sending
pulses of light from the source A (on the floor) to a mirror B (on the
ceiling) and then back to the floor. This is the train frame K.

________ B_________
|
|
| L
|
________ A_________


In frame K, where this light clock is at rest, the light pulses trace
out a path of length 2L and the period of the clock is 2L divided by
the speed of light, that is:

T_aba = 2L/c

Now consider an observer on the track, with respect to which the train
is moving at a speed V. This is the track frame K?.

___________B_________
/ \
/ \
/ \ L
/ \
_____ A_________A____
* X' * V -->


In frame K?, the light pulse traces out a longer, angled path, where
d_ab = D. Now the second postulate of special relativity states that
the speed of light is constant in all frames,

And it must ignore relative motion of the objects and insert the
old trick math that is just self limiting math.
What a bunch of crock.


Therefore T?_aba = T_aba / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

Self limiting math bull*** that is basically stating
1+1 does not equal 2
Your math is wrong. and if my math is wrong,
yours is also wrong again.
:)

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman



.

Quantcast