Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 18, 6:34 am, Albertito <albertito1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Cute. It's obvious you put thought into this, unfortunately the model
is still crap.
It is clear that if p = mc sinh(v/c), then kinetic energy
must be T = mc^2 (cosh(v/c) - 1), if you want E = mc^2 + T
to hold.
[note: do not argue against p = mc sinh(v/c) again, because
I already know how to derive it from first principles, your
demolition would be irreparable :-)]
Why? Its' inconsistent with observation.
Since you have worked pretty hard to make sure your model is self-
consistent, the real decider is - as always - observation. Go back to
my Tevatron example - work out the velocity of a 1 TeV proton in your
model and SR. Timing differences would be OBVIOUS as hell.
I'm only reaching for the low hanging fruit here. Slightly more
complicated things like cosmic ray muons just do not work in your
model.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Albertito
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- References:
- Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Dono
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Albertito
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Albertito
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Albertito
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Albertito
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- From: Albertito
- Relativistic Dynamics
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about relativity
- Next by Date: Re: The relativity of simultaneity
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- Next by thread: Re: Relativistic Dynamics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|