Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
- From: "Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:10:52 -0400
"Pmb" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:KJydneMyQdz9-OPVnZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Juan R. González-Álvarez" <juanREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:pan.2008.07.16.11.40.50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Daryl 'bad faith' and mistakes...
Speaking of mistakes I just realized that I may have made a mistake regaring
the notion of mass and E = mc^2. I had said that E = mc^2 didn't hold under
all circumstaces. However I came to realize lately that there are currently
two "definitions" of relativistic mass in the realtivity literature. E.g.
that used by Rindler (as well as Tolman) and that used by Schutz. In the
case of the fomer's definition I was wrong while in the case of the later's
defintion I'm right.
I just wanted to state this possible mistake on the principle that I believe
it is best to admit one's mistakes as soon as they are noticed.
Pete
.
- References:
- massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Pmb
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Cosmik de Bris
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: massless or massive photon?
- From: Peter M. Brown
- Re: new USENET guidelines (was: massless or massive photon?)
- From: Pmb
- massless or massive photon?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definition of "Ignorance"
- Next by Date: Re: Cosmic rays muons give us a clue about superluminal speeds and their respective truncated observed speeds
- Previous by thread: Re: another new flame by crackpot Dono
- Next by thread: Re: new USENET guidelines (new principle)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|