Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
On Jul 22, 4:22 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
<juanREM...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This set of recommendations was first prepared after noticing some nasty
behaviors on the USENET. Initially, I embraced the usual recommendation
to ignore trolls, crackpots, liars, flamers, and other nasty posters.
It depends on how you measure efficacy of online scientific
discussion. What is it you hope gets accomplished on a newsgroup?
PD
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
... to ignore trolls, crackpots, liars, flamers, and other nasty posters. ... this recommendation did not work for the most nasty individuals ... Also there was some recent discussion in moderated newsgroup ...
(sci.physics.relativity) - Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
... to ignore trolls, crackpots, liars, flamers, and other nasty posters. ... this recommendation did not work for the most nasty individuals ... Also there was some recent discussion in moderated newsgroup ...
(sci.physics.relativity) - Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
... to ignore trolls, crackpots, liars, flamers, and other nasty posters. ... this recommendation did not work for the most nasty individuals ... Also there was some recent discussion in moderated newsgroup ...
(sci.physics.relativity) - Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
... to ignore trolls, crackpots, liars, flamers, and other nasty posters. ... this recommendation did not work for the most nasty individuals ... Also there was some recent discussion in moderated newsgroup ...
(sci.physics.relativity) - Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
... to ignore trolls, crackpots, liars, flamers, and other nasty posters. ... this recommendation did not work for the most nasty individuals ... Also there was some recent discussion in moderated newsgroup ...
(sci.physics.relativity) |
|
