Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
- From: Cosmik de Bris <cosmik.debris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:24:54 +1200
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:22:02 +1200, Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote
(in article <pan.2008.07.22.09.23.57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
This set of recommendations was first prepared after noticing some nasty
behaviors on the USENET. Initially, I embraced the usual recommendation
to ignore trolls, crackpots, liars, flamers, and other nasty posters.
This worked for most of cases. For example, after postings from certain
nasty posters were ignored several times, the posters stopped from
replying more...
Juan, this is going to happen anywhere you post because you don't have
discussions, you make assertions. Anyone who disagrees with you is a "nasty
poster". It is your style that is the problem.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Physics versus Mathematics
- Next by Date: Re: Unbiased Spectroscopic Data Prove QED is Inaccurate
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
- Next by thread: Re: Recommendations for effective online scientific discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
