Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 24, 9:22 am, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
And no such huge speed was implied. As I already mentioned to you, H&K
performed their experiments at speeds much, much lower than even
0.00001c.
H&K was not a thought experiment.
Neither was H&K supportive of Special Relativity because
it failed to demonstrate:
<<... Einstein's relativity principle, which states that:
All inertial frames are totally equivalent for
the performance of all physical experiments. >>
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node108.html
Sue...
PD
- Etc, etc, etc ...
Marcel Luttgens
Let's settle this first before continuing
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- References:
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: PD
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: mluttgens
- Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Prev by Date: Re: new straw man by David
- Next by Date: Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
- Previous by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Next by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|