Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:53:20 +0100
"harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1216901472_696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Uncle Ben" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:c0a17537-e183-468a-99ad-0269bddcb67a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Electromagnetic theory says that a moving charge creates a magnetic
| > field that acts on any other moving charge with a force qv x B.
| >
| > So let us consider two charged ping-pong balls at rest in the
| > laboratory frame of reference. If this laboratory happens to be in
| > outer space, we can release them and watch them move apart because of
| > electrostatic repulsion.
| >
| > Another laboratory in another spaceship flies by. Relative to the
| > second laboratory, we have moving charges. One creates a magnetic
| > field with lines of force as circles around its path. Assume the
| > direction of motion is such that the two balls are on a line
| > perpendicular to the motion, so the second ball is moving right
| > alongside the first ball and can feel its magnetic field at maximum
| > strength.
| >
| > We see that v x B is in the direction such that the force is
| > attractive, making the two balls repel each other with less force than
| > the electrostatic force. If you work it all out quantitatively, the
| > magnetic force is always weaker than the electrostatic force, but with
| > faster motion, it increases, approaching the strength of the
| > electrostatic force as the speed approaches the speed of light as a
| > limit. See the Feynman Lectures on Physics for the full details.
| >
| > So if we release the balls and let them fly apart, we see that the
| > acceleration w.r.t. the second laboratory is slower. In the limit as
| > the speed approaches c, the acceleration stops, because the two forces
| > are equal and opposite.
| >
| > This is exactly what happens if time is dilated. The motion slows down
| > because time slows down w.r.t. the second spaceship laboratory. Time
| > doesn't slow down w.r.t. the first spaceship laboratory, and the balls
| > fly apart quickly. Time is relative!
| >
| > Isn't that amusing!
|
| The nice thing of physics is that it all fits together - or at least, it
| should be like that! :-)
|
| > It shouldn't be surprising however if you understand that magnetism is
| > just the relativistic manifestation of electrostatics w.r.t. a
| > different frame of reference. But nobody realized that before
| > Einstein.
|
| I'm afraid that that is a (popular) misconception. For example: you would
| impress me if you could correctly describe the magnetic field of a
magnetic
| coil (fed by a battery) as "just the relativistic manifestation of
| electrostatics w.r.t. a different frame of reference".
|
| Harald
You would impress me if you could take you head out of your arse.
Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?
"Easy: he did NOT say that." - cretin harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx
According to moron van lintel, Einstein did not write this equation.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
.
- References:
- Time dilation pre-Einstein
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
- From: harry
- Time dilation pre-Einstein
- Prev by Date: Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
- Next by Date: Re: new straw man by David
- Previous by thread: Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
- Next by thread: Re: Time dilation pre-Einstein
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|