Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:44:34 -0400
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, Spaceman
<spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:06:41 -0400
<fd2dncxb0pr3ABrVnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
No, I don't think so either - there will always be a steady fresh
supply of retiring engineers and highshool dropouts who learned
to handle a square root.
But don't loose too much sleep over it - if you can't stop it, try
to enjoy it :-)
Dirk,
What is the square root of -1?
How about -4?
Negative numbers can't have square roots huh?
:)
Not real square roots. The consideration of the solution
of the equation x^2 + 1 = 0 led to an entire new class of
numbers, namely imaginary and complex numbers.
???
x^2 + 1 does not equal 0.
Who the hell ever has sadi that it does?
Wow.. no wonder you guys are all screwed up.
If you are trying to make it equal 0 of course you
are going to have to make up "imaginary numbers"
Why would you want to prove an illogical equation
such as that?
Might as well start proving that 2+ 2 = 40,000000
also.
:)
Of course understanding why might require some
considerations as to why negative numbers exist at all,
and what their products yield.
Negative numbers exist only to show a postive motion
in a different direction.
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- References:
- Relativity and delusion
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Relativity and delusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Next by thread: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading