Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:54:12 -0400
Androcles wrote:
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:vbvml5-7q2.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In sci.physics.relativity, Spaceman
<spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:44:34 -0400
<F86dnUN61vMbIhXVnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, Spaceman
<spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:06:41 -0400
<fd2dncxb0pr3ABrVnZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
No, I don't think so either - there will always be a steady fresh
supply of retiring engineers and highshool dropouts who learned
to handle a square root.
But don't loose too much sleep over it - if you can't stop it,
try to enjoy it :-)
Dirk,
What is the square root of -1?
How about -4?
Negative numbers can't have square roots huh?
:)
Not real square roots. The consideration of the solution
of the equation x^2 + 1 = 0 led to an entire new class of
numbers, namely imaginary and complex numbers.
???
x^2 + 1 does not equal 0.
The intent of the problem is to find the value(s) of x
such that the equation is satisfied.
(0, i) and (0,-i), there being two roots.
-i * -i = (-1)*i * (-1)*i = 1 * i^2
i^2 = -1 by definition. Does Spaceman understand "definition"?
I understand the definition of imaginary.
And since I know that definition, I know
x^2+1 = 0 is still not logical no matter how much
imaginary crap you throw under it.
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Darwin123
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- References:
- Relativity and delusion
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Androcles
- Relativity and delusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Prediction of Mathematical Beauty
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Next by thread: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|