Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers

On 27 jul, 17:52, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
papa_r...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

You know nothing about logic, so whatever you say will logically be
wrong just because you are saying it!.

To discuss your insane example, first you have to clearly state:
a) What is the definition of right (r) and left (l).

An observers right side and left side dufus.
If I need to explain right and left to you, you truly
must have problems putting your shoes on huh?

b) What is the definition of 0.

nothing.
the center
straight in front of the observer.
Sheesh
Can't you think for yourself at all?

c) What is the definition of the markings "|" and what level of
rightness of leftness means, for instance two marks.

You can make them what you want,
That is the beauty of a numberline moron.
It is a scale that can be variable depending on the needed
scale of measurment.
You sure are not too smart huh?

So you see, unless you clearly state your problem asking for r*r is
nonsense.

Only nonsense to those that can't think on thier own and
need their hands held even when putting on shoes.

Grow up! ilogical child

Poor Miguel
he can't tell which shoe goes on the correct foot
and he calls me the child.
LOL
He is truly stuck in ROM only mode.
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman

You say "An observers right side and left side". That is totally
ambiguous...since you are missing with respect to what?
Now giving you level of IQ, it is possible that you are thinking right
as your right hand and left as your left hand?

And 0 is your belly button or your mouth or your nose? If that is the
case "|" is what? your shoulder or your arm length.

In other words, is your example numeric or not. If it is not numeric
your assertions are bogus.
If they are numeric, then the markings, left and right are just
conventions and you can arbitrarily say r=one and l=-one, and since
r*r is the area of a square and since |r|=|l| it follows what
everybody nows since ever, that is l*1=(-1)*(-1)=r*r=(1)*(1)=one

Miguel Rios


.