Re: Prior knowledge Fata Morgana Predictions refute Relativity !

Am Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:51:07 -0700 schrieb Triacon Tahedron
<wsjf8@xxxxxxxxx> in
77a92e3d-2b4e-4083-9956-aa14950748a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Appears to me, that relativity is the only theory I know, having no
mathematical beauty

The mathematical beauty is that aside from 3 basic physics axioms all of
the theory is derived from mathematical principles.


And the predictions they make, are prior knowledge predicions

Not true: see below.


What kind of reverse engineer predictions are these, when you already
know the results of the predictions

As with planet Mercury, he knew the results, than he made the
predictions in a way that it correspond with the priory reverse engineer
knowledge he had

Actually Relativity predicted it first in 1915 and then in 1919 the
observational result was obtained.

cf
http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/EinsteinTest.html

Obviously you don't understand what you are critisizing.


Also, the muons, before they been detected at the surface of oceans,
there been no any predictions about them at all

Now you are contradicting yourself. Besides, Relativity doesn't make any
predictions about the existence of particles, only their behavior.


Hahahahaaa, then they came with the postmortem predictions

One hundred years of fata morgana relativity predictions, where is the
mathematical beauty of relativity!!

You need to take a science class.

Mind you, I'm not defending Einstein. I just don't understand why people
like you have to base their arguments on ignorance of the subject they
are critisizing.

--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!
.

Loading