Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
- From: The TimeLord <math-n-physics-not@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:52:02 -0500
Am Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:42:55 -0700 schrieb Uncle Ben <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx> in
833867bb-4bab-4655-aad1-59d74f0c8e5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Jul 28, 4:35 pm, The TimeLord <math-n-physics-...@xxxxxxx> wrote:[...]
Am Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:18:06 -0700 schrieb Uncle Ben <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
in 5277af6b-2456-4669-bec1-24e62a6f1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
It might seem strange to consider this plebian topic in a newsgroup[...]
[...]The way I usually explain it is as follows. We know from physics that
under constant force, the work done by an object is F*x where x is the
Usually people buy that.
Interesting.
It works for a physicist, but I am aiming for younger readers.
OMG! I should have known. In that case I think your original presentation
would work the best absent any other ideas. Take care.
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!
.
- References:
- On the muliplication of negative numbers
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
- From: The TimeLord
- Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
- From: Uncle Ben
- On the muliplication of negative numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Prior knowledge Fata Morgana Predictions refute Relativity !
- Next by Date: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Previous by thread: Re: On the muliplication of negative numbers
- Next by thread: Re: New nonsensical post by crackpot Eric
- Index(es):