Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Hans.de.Vries.NL@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 30, 1:14 am, Hans.de.Vries...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Tom,
This is indeed what I remember from Steve Carlip's paper.
(That there is an extra term involved in the GR case)
I used the word "similar" with this extra term in mind.
Regards, Hans
I've included a footnote now :^)
http://www.physics-quest.org/Book_Chapter_EM_LorentzContr.pdf
Regards, Hans
http://www.physics-quest.org/
.
- References:
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Van Flandern
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Pmb
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Pmb
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Hans . de . Vries . NL
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Prev by Date: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Next by Date: Re: Special Relativity in the 21st century
- Previous by thread: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Next by thread: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Index(es):