Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question

The TimeLord wrote:
Am Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:59:39 -0400 schrieb "Spaceman"
<spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
dJKdnVPmkMSDRBLVnZ2dnUVZ_vKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:

The TimeLord wrote:
Am Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:56:50 -0700 schrieb Symmetry Observer
<mathxxmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> in
896af829-0712-444d-a432-ba57976a88b8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

If in Special Relativity, we let u denote the proper time of an
observer (the invariant time carried by an observer in his rest
frame).

Have to stop right there. The observer does not have proper time.
Proper time, by definition exists on the object being observed. Also
time is not invariant.

BZZZZZT
Wrong
Time is science is "invariant"
I think you should try and come back to science some yr.

BZZZZZT
Wrong
Time in science is *never* invariant.

BZZZZZT
Wrong again,
It seems you are using a science that allows for multiple
standards.
You have stepped out of science Sir.
You have stepped aboard the TARDIS and lost
the science of measurement completely.
Science does not use multiple standards.
Multiple standards causes crashes of airplanes, trains
and automobiles, I also causes crashes of electrons and protons
at places where they do not actually crash.
I see you have no clue how to "time" things scientifically.
That is pretty damn sad for a "TimeLord".

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
    ... observer (the invariant time carried by an observer in his rest ... I think you should try and come back to science some yr. ... coordinate transformations. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Very Simple But Fundamental Question
    ... observer (the invariant time carried by an observer in his rest ... Proper time, by definition exists on the object being observed. ... I think you should try and come back to science some ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... Science deals with observable, verifiable, identifiable phenomina. ... source and the observer and as it is impossible for the observer to ... the +/- operator when you are computing speeds as seen in the other FoR. ... Lorentz for the aether that Lorentz was trying to recessitate after MMX ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
    ... ethos of this 'science' as his ideology. ... forces on the observer a kind of bureaucracy of observation. ... What did Skinner ... Stimulus and Response." ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
    ... Science has progressed beyond Leibniz what passed for science then ... science has been catching up to Leibniz: ... Frames of reference simply say "This is what the observer sees". ... That is true for Monadic hypothesis. ...
    (sci.physics)