Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:25:52 -0400
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, Spaceman
<spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:08:24 -0400
<uIydndrjHMC2RhLVnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, Darwin123
<drosen0000@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
<ee98a04b-b27c-4d38-8dc9-e5866377eda2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Jul 27, 3:53 pm, "Spaceman"
<space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Any complex number that has an imaginary component equal to the
And what would you use for 45 degrees then?
real component has a phase angle of 45 degrees. Some complex
numbers with a phase angle of 45 degrees are:
1+i
2+2i
3+3i
1.5+1.5i
Here, i is the square root of -1.
Which means i = -1, according to Spaceman, since
sqrt(-1) = -1 according to him.
No,
i is a variable silly.
Yes, i is a variable such that i^2 = -1. Therefore i = -1,
according to your "math". (More standard math will have
its own ideas, of course.)
No,
According to my math, i is irrelevant and imaginary without
physical representation.
This is going to take some work, folks; best I can do is lay out
the path, but I can't be even close to sure that Spaceman will be
able to walk it. ;-)
What will really take work from you is to show that
a negative direction is a negative direction to all observers.
Have fun!
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman
.
- References:
- Relativity and delusion
- From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Androcles
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Darwin123
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Jerry
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Jerry
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Jerry
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Darwin123
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Relativity and delusion
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Relativity and delusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanical Problems for the 21st Century: First order in time relativistic wavefunction
- Next by Date: Re: Is there length contraction in SRT, uncle Ben?
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Next by thread: Re: Relativity and delusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading