Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell




"Ben Bean" <kenscrapthisvicki@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:48938543$0$19664$822641b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Tom Roberts wrote:
| > shalayka@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
| >> Are the gravitational time dilation experienced by a test particle
| >> the same for these two setups?
| >> 1) A single gravitating body of mass M at a distance of R from the
| >> test particle ... tau = t sqrt(1 - 2GM/(Rc^2)).
| >> 2) A homogeneous shell of mass M of radius R, where the test particle
| >> is inside of the shell (doesn't need to be at the centre since
| >> dtau/dr = 0 inside).
| >
| > If your "test particle" has a standard clock, and if one compares the
| > tick rate of that clock with an identical clock located at spatial
| > infinity, then for the two cases the comparisons will be the same.
| > [...]
| > Tom Roberts
|
| Sure, I'll concede to TR's superior smarts

HAHAHA!
Give in to an idiot, you must be an idiot.

The cretin Roberts doesn't have the balls or the brains to answer the
QUESTION:

Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?


Your answer goes here:

________________________________________________________

Other answers have been:

According to Ian Parker:

"We are not talking about the speed of light here we are talking
classical stability theory." -- Idiot Ian Parker.
______________________________________________________


According to cretin harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx

"Easy: he did NOT say that."
According to moron van lintel, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.

______________________________________________________

According to xxein:
It is an artefactual/superficially imposed yin-yang of sorts.
______________________________________________________

According to Lamenting Shubert:
Why do you want to know?
______________________________________________________

According to Imbecile Jimmy Black:

" In neither system (meaning frame of reference in modern-day terminology)
is the speed of light c-v or c+v. In both systems the speed of light is c."

According to the imbecile Jimmy Black, Einstein did not write the equation
he wrote.
______________________________________________________


According to Dork Bruere
"I don't give a damn what Einstein wrote."
______________________________________________________

According to Spirit of Truth:

that math is correct but WRONG
______________________________________________________




'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO and you have to
agree because I'm the great genius, STOOOPID, don't you
dare question it. -- Rabbi Albert Einstein






.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
    ... | Are the gravitational time dilation experienced by a test particle the ... Einstein did not write the equation he wrote. ... light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
    ... | Are the gravitational time dilation experienced by a test particle the ... | 2) A homogeneous shell of mass M of radius R, ... Einstein never said the three statements that you are talking ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Shrug
    ... >>> IMHO Einstein did what any sensible person would do in presenting a new ... Roberts's opinions are far from honest, he has hallucinations.< shrug> ... From: Tom Roberts ... "Amateurs look at data, professionals look at errorbars. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Masterpiece
    ... Tom Roberts wrote: ... >> GR is like a beautiful painting, and Einstein was the artist. ... Is spacetime independent of matter, or is it a part of matter? ... Could we say that the big bang unfolded in space-time or... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity
    ... >>electromagnetic force on a charged test particle at x0,y0,z0,t0 is ... >in the early 1950s from people who heard the exchange first hand. ... you said in your previous message that Einstein and Sagnac ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)

Quantcast