Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:44:27 -0400
Darwin123 wrote:
On Aug 4, 10:34 am, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Darwin123 wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:20 am, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Darwin123 wrote:
On Jul 28, 2:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it is caused by centripital force like you say, why is such called
spacetime
by relativists and said to be "time changing" instead of the "actual"
physical
cause you are stating?
Because the details of internal forces aren't known. However,
most of the details don't matter.
There is your ignorance then.
The details are what matters.
In fact it is the biggest thing that matters for finding "physical" causes.
Sheesh!
Get a clue!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Darwin123
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- References:
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Darwin123
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Darwin123
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- From: Darwin123
- Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Prev by Date: Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
- Next by Date: Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ
- Previous by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Next by thread: Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading