Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?

On Aug 21, 7:56 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 21, 6:12 am, mluttg...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[snip idiocy]

Yes, Marcel. We see that you still don't understand SR,

What I will never accept are stupid ideas.

Marcel Luttgens

with yet
another multi-hundred post thread proving it.

Stop posting. There is nothing here for you to learn from us and there
is nothing for you to teach. All you are doing is wasting everyone's
time.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are *observed* SR effects real?
    ... Stupid, I never denied that the effects were ... try to find in my posts where I claimed ... they even used H&K's experimental pseudo-results ... Marcel Luttgens ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relic neutrinos
    ... from somebody who can't correctly use elementary algebra! ... but you are the stupid one! ... Marcel Luttgens ... E'= m0c^2 * gamma ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativistic precession - A question to Shawn
    ... You are too stupid to understand Shawn's formula. ... Marcel Luttgens ... The reason you are having trouble is because Shawn's formulas are crap. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)