sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: HAARP
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: harry
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Meenken
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: ron_aikas
• Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: glird
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: OG
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: glird
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Kna
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Meenken
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mad CERN as way.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: xxein
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: i'm posing this issue about the known Black Wall effecct
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Meenken
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• What is our intellect ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Kna
• Re: Hi...all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hi...all
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Hi...all
  • From: Tushar
• Re: Hi...all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hi...all
  • From: Tushar
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Meenken
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: harry
• Re: Hi...all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Hi...all
  • From: Tushar
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Igor
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: xxein
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• I've written many books over the past 40 plus years.
  • From: fitz
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Edward Green
• The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: glird
• Any comments on 0709.1603 and 0809.2911
  • From: Melroy
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Waf
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: kenseto
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Meenken
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: horizon limits
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: harry
• horizon limits
  • From: Meenken
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: hanson
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dono
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Null Infinity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Null Infinity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Null Infinity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: relativity42
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Androcles
• Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: relativity42
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Null Infinity
  • From: peedah
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: cjcountess
• ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: STEPHEN HAWKING AND EUROPEAN TAXPAYERS
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dirk vd Mortel diverts posts to alt.moron
  • From: PD
• Re: Dirk vd Mortel diverts posts to alt.moron
  • From: semilog
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dirk vd Mortel diverts posts to alt.moron
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: STEPHEN HAWKING AND EUROPEAN TAXPAYERS
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Null Infinity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Waf
• Re: Dirk vd Mortel diverts posts to alt.moron
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: harry
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: harry
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Alen
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Null Infinity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: Dirk vd Mortel diverts posts to alt.moron
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dono
• Dirk vd Mortel diverts posts to alt.moron
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: shuba
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Igor
• Re: How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Igor
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Igor
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dono
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: dedanoe's 2nd knol
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Lorentz Transformation without " C "
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz Transformation without " C "
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz Transformation without " C "
  • From: Androcles
• Lorentz Transformation without " C "
  • From: peedah
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Mass, matter, dark matter, higgs bosson and everything
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Mass, matter, dark matter, higgs bosson and everything
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mass, matter, dark matter, higgs bosson and everything
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: glird
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Waf
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dono
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Sam Hay
• Mass, matter, dark matter, higgs bosson and everything
  • From: vrokolos
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Russell
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Alen
• How does a Faraday disk really work?
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: Dono
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: xxein
• Re: dedanoe's 2nd knol
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Galilean Electrodynamics - deleted from Wikipedia
  • From: shuba
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: dedanoe's 2nd knol
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Null Infinity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Null Infinity
  • From: peedah
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: Hayek
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: glird
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: glird
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Alen
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: Alen
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Waf
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: no need of aikido to bring einstein down
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Loving Varun's Friend group
  • From: aathi
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: glird
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: PD
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• At The Collider Fat Rats Leave The Sinking Ship!!!
  • From: semilog
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• At The Collider Fat Rats Leave The Sinking Ship!!!
  • From: semilog
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: glird
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: delta-T
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: harry
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: harry
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: delta-T
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Simple Simon
• The "malfunctioning" clock theory
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Waf
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: no need of aikido to bring einstein down
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: doug
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: delta-T
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: i'm posing this issue about the known Black Wall effecct
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: delta-T
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: K_h
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: i'm posing this issue about the known Black Wall effecct
  • From: dlzc
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: glird
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: doug
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• i'm posing this issue about the known Black Wall effecct
  • From: yeuypga1
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: oops; was Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: dlzc
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• What is infinity?
  • From: socratus
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Waf
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• oops; was Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: xxein
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Why accelerators cannot push electrons travel at speed more than "c
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why accelerators cannot push electrons travel at speed more than "c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: test SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: CALL FOR GLOBAL MAGNETIC MONOPOLE TESTING HELP
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Here are some of my books that you can read FREE
  • From: fitz
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Waf
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Vern
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: Are PIGEONS and AHARONOV BOHM related?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: CALL FOR GLOBAL MAGNETIC MONOPOLE TESTING HELP
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: doug
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: The Crests of Gravity !!!
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: RichD
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: RichD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: test SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• $ after the 2008 Elections $
  • From: fitz
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• "Gravity"
  • From: Wab
• transformation properties of vectors/covectors
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: xxein
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gaelicpatois
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: test SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: CALL FOR GLOBAL MAGNETIC MONOPOLE TESTING HELP
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: CALL FOR GLOBAL MAGNETIC MONOPOLE TESTING HELP
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Air Force1 and Air Jordan shoes PAYPAL wholesale
  • From: nike wholesale
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Wab
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Are PIGEONS and AHARONOV BOHM related?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: shuba
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Gyrogravitation and Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: What speed of light at The Collider??? Are they Insane???
  • From: Igor
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What speed of light at The Collider??? Are they Insane???
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: K_h
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein Dingleberries on the march!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• The Crests of Gravity !!!
  • From: semilog
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• What speed of light at The Collider??? Are they Insane???
  • From: semilog
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Wab
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: doug
• Re: Are PIGEONS and AHARONOV BOHM related?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: doug
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• air jordan shoes paypal sell
  • From: nike wholesale
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Percieved wavelength times frequency bullshit found and explained simply.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: dlzc
• Re: test SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: harry
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: harry
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Wab
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Are PIGEONS and AHARONOV BOHM related?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: CALL FOR GLOBAL MAGNETIC MONOPOLE TESTING HELP
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light and sound waves
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: CALL FOR GLOBAL MAGNETIC MONOPOLE TESTING HELP
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: test SPF
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: shuba
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: xxein
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: xxein
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: xxein
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: OG
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: Igor
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Igor
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: mL
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: RichD
• test SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: xxein
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Dono
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: dlzc
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Where are the missing Electrons at The Collider ???
  • From: semilog
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why accelerators cannot push electrons travel at speed more than "c
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: delta-T
• The Real Large Collider is along Equator !!!
  • From: semilog
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: shuba
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Dono
• Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: delta-T
• Re: Experiment Invalidates the 2nd Postulate
  • From: delta-T
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• new nike jordan shoes sell in( www.cncircle.cn )
  • From: oo
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: harry
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: shuba
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• CALL FOR GLOBAL MAGNETIC MONOPOLE TESTING HELP
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Wab
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: harry
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Dono
• ABOUT THE USE OF THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Heisenberg vs. Einstein
  • From: RichD
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: xxein
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Experimental non-Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: harry
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• A note to Misses Erica Gisse
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Wab
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: harry
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Dono
• Re: Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Time Dilation reduces the Speed of moving Objects
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: The Hadron Money Makers Machine !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Igor
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Confuscator
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Continuous Flow of Champagne at The Collider !!!
  • From: Confuscator
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Confuscator
• Re: The Hadron Money Makers Machine !!!
  • From: Confuscator
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mad CERN as way.
  • From: socratus
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Basic question on reference frames (moved from "Experimental Evidence of Special Relativity")
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Wab
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: harry
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: bringin einstein and lorentz to justice
  • From: glird
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: glird
• Re: The Hadron Money Makers Machine !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Fundamental contradictions at The Collider, Occult Aristocracy !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Perceived wavelength vs physical wavelength relative speeds.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Perceived wavelength vs physical wavelength relative speeds.
  • From: Spaceman
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Oki
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Hadron Money Makers Machine !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Fundamental contradictions at The Collider, Occult Aristocracy !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: The Hadron Money Makers Machine !!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Hadron Money Makers Machine !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Steve Wilson
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Steve Wilson
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Very interesting exchange on link between two arrows of time
  • From: babaluyee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Vortex theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Steve Wilson
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Steve Wilson
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: YBM
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• The mad CERN as way.
  • From: socratus
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Oki
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: PD
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: wugi
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: harry
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: harry
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: harry
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Vortex theory
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: xxein
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: xxein
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: xxein
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• A SHORT COMPARITION BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: sal
• Re: test SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: EINSTEINIANA: DISCUSSIONS IN ENGLISH AND FRENCH
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: doug
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: harry
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: test SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: John Park
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Oki
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: PD
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: harry
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: harry
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: EINSTEINIANA: DISCUSSIONS IN ENGLISH AND FRENCH
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: xxein
• Re: light inside a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: xxein
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Baird
• light inside a black hole
  • From: RichD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: EINSTEINIANA: DISCUSSIONS IN ENGLISH AND FRENCH
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: harry
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Have they collided two electrons together???
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Double Blind Peer Review
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Schrodinger's Universe, the new book written by Dr. Milo Wolff, may change science.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Double Blind Peer Review
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: bringin einstein and lorentz to justice
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Schrodinger's Universe, the new book written by Dr. Milo Wolff, may change science.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: glird
• Schrodinger's Universe, the new book written by Dr. Milo Wolff, may change science.
  • From: fitz
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: harry
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Oki
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Power always Corrupts
  • From: PD
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Ok guys. Lets put our heads together.
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: harry
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: bringin einstein and lorentz to justice
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Power always Corrupts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: The twin paradox simplified
  • From: Androcles
• The twin paradox simplified
  • From: bill
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Ok guys. Lets put our heads together.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Power always Corrupts
  • From: maxwell
• talk.religion.course-miracle
  • From: amulu
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: xxein
• Re: Shameless Aristocracy at The Collider, they use Champagne !!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Androcles
• They need a Gravity Tractor at the Collider !
  • From: Iglu
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Shameless Aristocracy at The Collider, they use Champagne !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: Ok guys. Lets put our heads together.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: Ok guys. Lets put our heads together.
  • From: glird
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• test:astro
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Have they collided two electrons together???
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Condition for LHC not to produce a dangerous black hole
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Hadron is too late to be Stopped !!!
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Arrogance and Aristocracy at The Collider !!!
  • From: Hayek
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Hadron is too late to be Stopped !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Arrogance and Aristocracy at The Collider !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: The Hadron is too late to be Stopped !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Hadron is too late to be Stopped !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: new nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Hadron is too late to be Stopped !!!
  • From: dlzc
• The Hadron is too late to be Stopped !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Reason for Life is to Produce Black Holes !!!
  • From: Iglu
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Our Teachers know their Black Holes???
  • From: Monocle
• Re: new nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: YBM
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: glird
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Raghar
• answer to YBM's bell problem
  • From: rbwinn
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Oki
• Re: About the LT and the Euclidean geometry
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: new nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new nonsenses by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: xxein1
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Dono
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Spaceman
• Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Monocle
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Missing Time Paradox still not solved (the Storage) !!!
  • From: Monocle
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: maxwell
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Oki
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dave Burr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dave Burr
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dave Burr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: greysky
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: YBM
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: YBM
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: YBM
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dave Burr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dave Burr
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hawking rays.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dave Burr
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: mich
• Re: THE RELATIVITY OF THE SIMULTANEITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dave Burr
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Hawking rays.
  • From: Tony
• THE RELATIVITY OF THE SIMULTANEITY
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Yeah.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• has the cern taken account for butt^2 in their predicktion re mbh safety?
  • From: mozzie
• Yeah.
  • From: mozzie
• It's pretty slow/quiet in this ng eh?
  • From: Tony
• Hi Mozzie.
  • From: Tony
• Hi Tony.
  • From: mozzie
• Arrow of time confusion.
  • From: Tony
• The sheath of time.
  • From: Tony
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Bye.
  • From: mozzie
• Butt for time and eternity.
  • From: mozzie
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Jogging ladies
  • From: mozzie
• Time goes slow sometimes
  • From: mozzie
• KE in speeding bullet
  • From: mozzie
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tlu
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Ok guys. Lets put our heads together.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Baboon Edward Green know nothing about the Black Hole is about to happen !!!
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A new interpretation for time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: glird
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• A new interpretation for time
  • From: kenseto
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Tlu
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: CLAUSIUS ZOMBIE WORLD IS MORE FUNDAMENTAL THAN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: mogi77
• Baboon Edward Green know nothing about the Black Hole is about to happen !!!
  • From: Monocle
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Monocle
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: They force me Dragons in a Black Hole
  • From: Monocle
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• CMBR
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Re: They force me Dragons in a Black Hole
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: <The "measured" light speed cannot be "absolute" one !!>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Igor
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Relativity gets You Fired !!!
  • From: Monocle
• Re: Relativity gets You Fired !!!
  • From: Monocle
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Monocle
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Are They Going To Release These Dragons???
  • From: Monocle
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• They force me Dragons in a Black Hole
  • From: Monocle
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• ABOUT THE LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is there a moderated version of this newsgroup?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Experiment Invalidates the 2nd Postulate
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Isn't it enough to just say: " Mass = Energy / c^2 " ?
  • From: Dono
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: PD
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Experiment Invalidates the 2nd Postulate
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experiment Invalidates the 2nd Postulate
  • From: delta-T
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: extremesoundandlight@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• "Gravity"
  • From: Tlu
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: harry
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Vern
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Living Dragons into Black Holes???
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Isn't it enough to just say: " Mass = Energy / c^2 " ?
  • From: Pmb
• <The "measured" light speed cannot be "absolute" one !!>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• I'm sure that the "absolute c speed" is the cube's presence in lines, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• I'm sure that E/m is "in absolute" the pure ratio 9/1, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• By theory I take the "absolute" c^2 out 10^100, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• The "absolute" electron mass in kg, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• The space-time bond in the electron mass in kg, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• The phisichal constant's quantities are pure ratios, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• Romano Amodeo: In this way the Planck's constant by the absolute power 10^100
  • From: amoram
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• My unification of the 2 light theories, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: amoram
• Re: Relativity gets You Fired !!!
  • From: greysky
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Roger Shore
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Relativity gets You Fired !!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• This is too funny
  • From: Dono
• This is too funny
  • From: Dono
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: Androcles
• Relativity gets You Fired !!!
  • From: Monocle
• Re: Living Dragons into Black Holes???
  • From: Monocle
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Surprise! Nuclear [snip]
  • From: dlzc
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: YBM
• Gyroscopic Inductance
  • From: extremesoundandlight@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: extremesoundandlight@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: John Park
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Tlu
• transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: test
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: harry
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: Dono
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: Dono
• MMX falsifies the Lorentz transformation
  • From: mluttgens
• Advertisement Sales / Promotion / PR Promos - International Visual Art & Media
  • From: Giuen
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Estimation of relativistic velocities, on the cheap
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: shuba
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: Isn't it enough to just say: " Mass = Energy / c^2 " ?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: YBM
• Re: Isn't it enough to just say: " Mass = Energy / c^2 " ?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: glird
• Re: Experiment Invalidates the 2nd Postulate
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: dwhig265
• Relativity to Quantum Physics link discovered - The Link
  • From: Monocle
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Isn't it enough to just say: " Mass = Energy / c^2 " ?
  • From: harry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof of Law of Conservation of Mass?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Isn't it enough to just say: " Mass = Energy / c^2 " ?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Antirelativity - The true motive
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: harry
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: harry
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: harry
• Re: Time Dilation and Radiactive Decay.
  • From: harry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: velocity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light???
  • From: Monocle
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Roger Shore
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: glird
• Re: free space photon?
  • From: glird
• Re: Time Dilation and Radiactive Decay.
  • From: harry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Time Dilation and Radiactive Decay.
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Mass dilation
  • From: lithium
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Vern
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: velocity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: velocity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Proof of Law of Conservation of Mass?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Isn't it enough to just say: " Mass = Energy / c^2 " ?
  • From: Pmb
• Re: velocity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Antirelativity - The true motive
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: velocity
  • From: PD
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The equation x=ct violates the Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The relativity of simultaneity
  • From: PD
• Re: IaSNe observations
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: harry
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Retic
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Ok guys. Lets put our heads together.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: velocity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Ok guys. Lets put our heads together.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: velocity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: About the LT and the Euclidean geometry
  • From: harry
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Anig
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The tipping point: x'/(c-v) = 1/(c-v).
  • From: Androcles