Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.




<glird@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5ea0c740-6ddf-428f-804b-b993be63c396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 31, 3:56 pm, "Androcles" wrote:

< All I can do is point out that I am responsible for the
spread***, I am easily traced by law enforcement,
my page has a definite source
(androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk)
and I would be prosecuted if I attempted to spread harmful
software on the internet.
I recommend that you do not open software for which you do
not know the origin, but in this case you do know the origin.>

Why don't YOU show how to get from E's
subject equation to the one on the next page; and then show
that all E's equations along the way fit, thus allow him
to have accurately derived, Poincare's (preexisting) "Lorentz
transformation Equation group"???

< It's all here:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm
What you call a "Lorentz transformation" is nothing more than
the eccentricity of an ellipse:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Eccentricity.html
It is not some remarkable discovery by Poincare or Lorentz or
anyone else, it's been known since the ancient Greeks ... >

I repeat: Why don't YOU show how to get from E's subject
equation to the one on the next page, and then show that all
E's equations along the way fit, thus allow him to have
accurately derived, Poincare's (preexisting) "Lorentz
Transformation Equation group"???
I bet that neither you nor anyone else can do that!

============================================
Because I'm not a fucking idiot to waste my time on your trolling,
that's why, but if you want to make it worth my while put your
money where your loud mouth is.
============================================



< Name the sum you wish to wager and a referee we can both
trust to decide the winner, then deposit the sum with that
person. I will match it.>

I would do that, but I saw from your postings in another
thread that you already lost!
Here is the bet:
I bet you $250,000 that neither you nor anyone else can
show that all E's equations along the way fit, thus allow
him to have accurately derived, Poincare's (preexisting)
"Lorentz Transformation Equation group", the LTE.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since *I* have already shown Einstein's equations to be faulty
why would I bet against myself, you fucking cretin?








.


Quantcast