transformation equations
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
These are the Galilean transformation equations, which
scientists threw away in 1905 as a description of relativity,
replacing them with these more famous equations, with their length
contraction.
x'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
y'=y
z'=z
t'=(t-vx/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
According to Dr. Albert Einstein, these more famous equations
with their length contraction are the correct equations to describe
transmission of light because they show light to be traveling at
c=186,000 miles per second in all frames of reference. The Galilean
transformation equations were thrown away by science because
scientists said that they could not show light to be traveling at c in
all frames of reference, which scientists said that they had proven
was happening.
Einstein used these two little equations to show that light
was traveling at the same speed in two frames of reference.
x=ct
x'=ct'
He said that he extracted these two equations from the Lorentz
equations, the famous equations with the length contraction.
But the same thing can be done with the Galilean transformation
equations if velocity of light is used instead of speed of light.
Since t'=t in the Galilean transformation equations, we use n' for
time on a clock in S', the frame of reference in motion.
w= velocity of light
x=wt
x'=wn'
These values for x and x' substitute directly into the Galilean
transformation equations.
wn'=wt-vt
n'=t(1-v/w)
t'=t=x'/(w-v) = x/w
This makes time a little more relative than scientists want to
admit it is, but I thank a few centuries of time might result in a few
scientists becoming convinced that there is no length contraction.
Obviously, we are not moving as quickly as Galileo did in overcoming
scientific devotion to the Ptolemaic system of astronomy, but I think
the false information associated with this field of study can be
overcome in a matter of centuries instead of millenia.
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: transformation equations
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: YBM
- Re: transformation equations
- Prev by Date: Re: test
- Next by Date: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
- Previous by thread: Re: test
- Next by thread: Re: transformation equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
