Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.

On Sept 3, 6:10 p,m. "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

we have a common goal and there should be no animosity between us.

On Sep 4, 1:39 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<gl...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:c833a95c-6fc4-49fc-bf8e-3f273e0dc9ef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 2, 1:34 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> <gl....@xxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:298259c4-e02e-4629-89c8-0aa08631210a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 1, 7:24 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

mathematicians do not make assumptions.

  Of course not, egohead,

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you snip something?  I seem to be missing whatever
point you were trying to make, shithead.

My fault!

In replying to an earlier message from Andy, I ignored the time and
date
that he wrote it, and answered it rudely. When I saw him "reverting
to
form" (thought I) I was going to quote various passages he wrote
and when he wrote them, to show that he was an egomaniac who could not
carry on a legitimate discussion. Instead, i discovered that his
intemperate language was in response to - thus provoked by - MINE.
Instead of abandoning the growing glee at finding an able
mathematician
as a partner in solving remaining (tiny) details re the structure of
everything that physically exists, I am very happy to APOLOGIZE to
him.
I therefore do apologize, Andy, and will try to remain cordial and
friendly despite - and perhaps even BECAUSE of - any disagreements we
might have as to our points of view along the way.

glird
.

Quantcast