Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: YBM <ybmess@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:36:54 +0200
rbwinn a écrit :
On Sep 9, 4:10�pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:rbwinn a �crit :
The time n' in B is saying that the two light rays meet at the originThere is no "time n'" in B in this case : there is two candidates.
of B
Which one do you select ? Why ?
, not at the origin of A. �Beside not being what you formulas says, this is absurd : now,
according to you, the two light rays are meeting on the bell
for observers in A, but elsewhere for observers in B. Note that,
then, the bell won't ring neither.
How absurd are you going to be ?
All it takes to ring a bell at the origin of A is for two light rays,
one from each direction to meet at the origin of A at the same time.
I proved that was happening. The bell rings, regardless of anything
else. In the same amount of time, B moves a distance of vt relative
to A. When the origin of B is a distance of vt from the origin of A,
the bell rings, whether an observer in B is hallucinating, dead, or
whatever. That is just the way it works.
Let me recall you what you just wrote :
The time n' in B is saying that the two light rays meet at the origin
of B
.... where you just express clearly how absurd your "theory" is.
....
Well, You claim to have proven the bell will not ring. It is obvious
to me that it would.
Robert B. Winn
I've proven that IN YOUR "THEORY" the bell ring or not according to
different observers.
You happen not to care asserting contradictory statements : the
bell ring for A and for B (what you just wrote), "the bell ring
for A, not for B" (what your theory directly implies).
Next time you'll pretend I've proven something, please
don't lie and write that I've proven Robert Winn's modified
"Galilean Transformation" to be absurd.
You can even provide the link :
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a39fe2523de79ced
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- References:
- answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: YBM
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: YBM
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- answer to YBM's bell problem
- Prev by Date: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Next by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Previous by thread: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Next by thread: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading