Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: YBM <ybmess@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:01:30 +0200
rbwinn a écrit :
On Sep 9, 4:36�pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:....
Let me recall you what you just wrote :
The time n' in B is saying that the two light rays meet at the origin... where you just express clearly how absurd your "theory" is.
of B
So you are saying that if a bunch of drunk scientists in B do not
believe the bell rings, then it does not ring.
I'm quoting you. Did you forget ?
I say that if two
light rays meet at the origin of A in frame of A from each direction
of the x axis at a time of a/c, then the bell will ring because those
were the conditions you set forth to have it ring. What the drunk
scientists in B believe does not affect whether or not the bell rings,
just whether two light rays meet in A at the origin. Sure enough, two
light rays meet in A at the origin. The bell rings.
You "theory" predict it will ring in A not in B.
You have some kind of mental disability I've never heard before.
Let me write it clear :
I didn't show "the bell won't ring in B".
I've shown "According to Robert Winn theory the ring will ring in A
and not in B".
Then, if YOU assert both your "theory" AND "the bell ring in A and in
B", you contradict yourself.
By the way, next time you'll pretend I've proven something, please
don't lie and write that I've proven Robert Winn's modified
"Galilean Transformation" to be absurd.
You can even provide the link :
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a39fe2523de79ced
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- References:
- answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: YBM
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: YBM
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: YBM
- Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- From: rbwinn
- answer to YBM's bell problem
- Prev by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Next by Date: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Previous by thread: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Next by thread: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|