Re: transformation equations
- From: YBM <ybmess@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:44:24 +0200
rbwinn a écrit :
On Sep 9, 12:17�pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:rbwinn a �crit :
I am not interested in the length contraction. YBM and I have alreadyStop lying. I've only proved that your so-called transformation is
proven it wrong.
meaningless.
And *you* proved nothing, but how dishonest you are.
So you are still claiming that the bell does not ring. Sorry, but it
has to ring. The Galilean transformation equations say it rings.
In GT, yes, not in you "theory" :
Robert Winn's best fumble :
> The time n' in B is saying that the two light rays meet at the origin
> of B
so... the ring bell in B but not in A (the bell is not at the origin
of B whenever the light rays meet !)
By the way, next time you'll pretend I've proven something, please
don't lie and write that I've proven Robert Winn's modified
"Galilean Transformation" to be absurd.
You can even provide the link :
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a39fe2523de79ced
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- References:
- transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: YBM
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- transformation equations
- Prev by Date: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Next by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Previous by thread: Re: transformation equations
- Next by thread: Re: transformation equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|