Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:33:30 -0500
I just realized I said something wrong:
Tom Roberts wrote:
Tom Van Flandern wrote:This field is the physical equivalent of the light-carrying medium,[this is TVF's fantasy theory, not GR]
Yes, if one only considers elementary situations with
weak fields, one could probably concoct a model of a
"light-carrying medium" that approximates the predictions
of GR for such physical situations. [...]
Nope, that is not possible. Such a "medium" could not possibly reproduce the gravitational time dilation between clocks at rest in a valley and on a mountaintop; nor could it reproduce the time dilation between relatively-moving clocks at the same gravitational potential.
If one attempted to invoke two different solutions (e.g. that "medium" for light and some magical "time dilation medium" for clocks that somehow "knows" about both gravitational potential and relative motion), then there would be double-counting for light rays between such clocks.
It's also not obvious that such a "medium" could reproduce observations of electric and magnetic fields. Indeed, all of the problems with aether theories and SR would arise.
Do not deceive yourself into thinking "all clocks use EM".
Spinning objects are clocks that use no EM in their time-
keeping mechanism, and GR predicts time dilation between
such mechanical clocks. Whether or not we have observed
such dilation is irrelevant, as this discussion is about
the structure of theories, and it's QUITE CLEAR that
TVF's fantasy theory cannot possibly be equivalent to GR.
Tom Roberts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Van Flandern
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Androcles
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- References:
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Vern
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Prev by Date: Shameless Aristocracy at The Collider, they use Champagne !!!
- Next by Date: They need a Gravity Tractor at the Collider !
- Previous by thread: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Next by thread: Re: The speed of gravity revisited
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|