Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 10, 1:44�pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a �crit :
On Sep 9, 12:17 pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a crit :
I am not interested in the length contraction. YBM and I have alreadyStop lying. I've only proved that your so-called transformation is
proven it wrong.
meaningless.
And *you* proved nothing, but how dishonest you are.
So you are still claiming that the bell does not ring. �Sorry, but it
has to ring. �The Galilean transformation equations say it rings.
In GT, yes, not in you "theory" :
Robert Winn's best fumble :
�> The time n' in B is saying that the two light rays meet at the origin
�> of B
so... the ring bell in B but not in A (the bell is not at the origin
of B whenever the light rays meet !)
The bell is at the origin of A when two light rays meet at the origin
of A. The bell rings in all frames of reference when those two light
rays meet.
Robert B. Winn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: transformation equations
- From: YBM
- Re: transformation equations
- From: YBM
- Re: transformation equations
- References:
- transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: PD
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: YBM
- Re: transformation equations
- From: rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations
- From: YBM
- transformation equations
- Prev by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Next by Date: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
- Previous by thread: Re: transformation equations
- Next by thread: Re: transformation equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading