Re: transformation equations

rbwinn a écrit :
On Sep 10, 1:44�pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a �crit :

On Sep 9, 12:17 pm, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a crit :
I am not interested in the length contraction. YBM and I have already
proven it wrong.
Stop lying. I've only proved that your so-called transformation is
meaningless.
And *you* proved nothing, but how dishonest you are.
So you are still claiming that the bell does not ring. �Sorry, but it
has to ring. �The Galilean transformation equations say it rings.
In GT, yes, not in you "theory" :

Robert Winn's best fumble :
�> The time n' in B is saying that the two light rays meet at the origin
�> of B

so... the ring bell in B but not in A (the bell is not at the origin
of B whenever the light rays meet !)

The bell is at the origin of A when two light rays meet at the origin
of A. The bell rings in all frames of reference when those two light
rays meet.

So you retract you own "theory". Well, I'm quite happy to see you
dropping the meaningless n' you have been supported for years here,
so admitting how meaningless is what you posted here for years.
You'd better apologize to people you insulted here, who tried to
help you. Just see for yourself what an appropriate behaviour would
be.

Which one do you pick then ? GT or LT ? Notice that GT has been
refuted by experiment.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: transformation equations
    ... has to ring. ... Robert Winn's best fumble: ... the ring bell in B but not in A (the bell is not at the origin ... of B whenever the light rays meet!) ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... So you are still claiming that the bell does not ring. ... The bell is at the origin of A when two light rays meet at the origin ... dropping the meaningless n' you have supported for years here. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: JSH: Stop being dense
    ... consider evens as a ring and then 2 is coprime to 6, ... meaningless, but you can't with the gaussian integers. ... maximal ideals are prime, so if is not a subset of any ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... So you are still claiming that the bell does not ring. ... of B whenever the light rays meet!) ... dropping the meaningless n' you have supported for years here. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Factorization of a sum of complex numbers with complex exponents in Q[I]?
    ... I don't think factoring this way is meaningless. ... Note also that you are working in a FIELD, rather than a ring. ... This is simply making a further transcendental extension. ...
    (sci.math)
Loading