Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result

From: Dono <sa_ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:51:30 -0700 (PDT)

On Sep 11, 8:30 am, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Ives-Stilwell is yet another joke,
They started by assuming lightspeed is constant to all.

It isn't? What did you discover , imbecile?

They failed the experimental procedure before they started.
They "assumed"

The "assumed" nothing. Actually H.Ives was a well-known anirelativist,
he wanted to disprove relativity. Fortunately, he was a good and
honest experimenter, so he ended up with a valid experiment.

experiments confirm time dilation !

Yes, imbecile.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Spaceman

References:
- Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Peter Riedt
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: The TimeLord
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Uncle Ben
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Dono
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Peter Riedt
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Dono
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Peter Riedt
- Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
  - From: Spaceman

Prev by Date: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
Next by Date: Re: answer to YBM's bell problem
Previous by thread: Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
Next by thread: Re: Three alternatives to explain the MMX null result
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread