Re: answer to YBM's bell problem

On Sep 11, 6:55�am, YBM <ybm...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
rbwinn a �crit :

Speed is the magnitude of velocity. �Light has a speed of c from
either direction in either frame of reference. �Remember your
equation, YBM?

This is yours, stupid and disgusting liar.

Well, I think we have a situation like what happened when Gottfried
Leibniz and Sir Isaac Newton both discovered calculus at the same
time. Who should get credit for it? Well, I am going to have to
defer and let you take credit for
n'=t(1-v/w)

n'=t(1-v/w). �w is velocity of light. �If the light is coming from -a,
it has a velocity of c, if it is coming from a, it has a velocity of -
c. �Either way it has a speed of c.

To show how absurd is your "theory", one only have to write down
precisely what is implied by you OWN WORDS :

� - in order to find a velocity of (c,0,0) for the light ray coming
� � from (-a,0,0) an observer in B should use a clock giving a
� � time n'=t(1-v/c)
� - in order to find a velocity of (-c,0,0) for the light ray coming
� � from (a,0,0) an observer in B should use a clock giving a
� � time n'=t(1+v/c)

You have it exactly right, YBM. This shows the light from -a and a
meeting at the origin of B at n'=a/c as shown by the n' clock.

Silly : when timing what happens in any experiment an observer need
only ONE clock.
Right. The observer in A has one clock that shows t, and the observer
in B has one clock that shows n'.

Whenever you're late on a appointement would you
give the excuse that you're in time because your clock is running
slow ?
Well, that is what observers in B usually do.

By the way, next time you'll pretend I've proven something, please
don't lie and write that I've proven Robert Winn's modified
"Galilean Transformation" to be absurd.
You can even provide the link :http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics..relativity/msg/a39fe2523de...

Robert Winn's best fumble :
�> The time n' in B is saying that the two light rays meet at the origin
�> of B

so... the ring bell in B but not in A (the bell is not at the origin
of B whenever the light rays meet !)

Well, originally we had a bell at the origin of A, which rang when
light beams met at the origin of A. In order to have a bell ring at
the origin of B, you have to put one there.
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... to determine how a clock should be tweaked ... the light ray is reflected by the mirror at a distance l ... The velocity of the light ray during the return ... � � Now let us talk about slow clocks. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... to determine how a clock should be tweaked ... the light ray is reflected by the mirror at a distance l ... The velocity of the light ray during the return ... � � Now let us talk about slow clocks. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate
    ... relative speed between observer and signal. ... Place clocks at points A and B in an inertial frame. ... As the clocks meet at S, a light ray is emitted as shown. ... Let each frame have a second clock at frame point. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: answer to YBMs bell problem
    ... it has a velocity of c, if it is coming from a, it has a velocity of - ... � - in order to find a velocity of for the light ray coming ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation equations
    ... it travels to, and the speed it is traveling, since you say it is not ... What do you think about the speed of light ray in S' according ... � to these formulas? ... shown by 'a slow clock' in S'. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading