Re: transformation equations

On Sep 11, 2:14�pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 11, 3:39�pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Sep 11, 6:17 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 11, 8:10 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 11, 5:44 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 10, 7:59 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 10, 5:12 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sep 10, 12:07 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey, I told you scientists the truth.

You've told very little except a string of lies, Bobby. You see
insults in the words of others and you do not see the physics
responses in the words of others. You see the truth in what you say,
and you do not see the lies after lies after lies in what you say. You
are mentally ill, Bobby.

Well, I thought your doctorate was in physics, not psychiatry, PD.
Are you trying to practice mdeicine without a license?

It's not necessary to be a doctor to tell when someone is feverish and
nauseous.
It's not necessary to be a car mechanic to tell when a car is smoking
and sputtering.
It's not necessary to be a psychiatrist to tell when someone like you
is a loon.

I would have to have a practitioner's license if I were to try to cure
you of your illness. But I'm not going to try to cure you. I'm just
observing that you're not well, dude. You've mentally puked on your
shoes. You're a junkie of sorts.

I see that you do not deny lying.
I see that you do not deny being mentally ill.
I see that you do not deny being uninterested in science.

PD

So as a scientist, you are trained to get people to deny things.

Why would you deny something that is true?
I certainly don't want you to deny something that is true.
I'm not in the least bit surprised that you don't deny them.

It seems as though when people do not pay attention to your efforts as
a scientist, it leaves you a little short of your goal.

Well, Bobby, as you've demonstrated amply, you have misread what my
goals are here. In contrast, yours are transparent.

So what are my goals, PD?
Here is a little problem that YBM proposed. �He has frames of
reference A and B with B in motion relative to A with a velocity of
v. �When the origin of B is at the origin of A, light is emitted at x=-
a and x=a. There is a bell at the origin of A that will ring if light
reaches it from both directions.
What I propose now is to put another identical bell at the origin of
B. �So my question to you Lorentz equation experts is this: �As seen
from frame of reference A, will both bells ring?
I say they will both ring.
Robert B. Winn

I'm not interested in discussing with you something that you're not
interested in.
I'd be happy to discuss something you're really interested in.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, if you are not interested in relativity, PD, then, of course,
you are not going to want to talk about it.
Robert B. Winn
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: transformation equations
    ... I see that you do not deny being mentally ill. ... I see that you do not deny being uninterested in science. ... There is a bell at the origin of A that will ring if light ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... I see that you do not deny being uninterested in science. ... There is a bell at the origin of A that will ring if light ... But you're not talking about relativity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... I see that you do not deny being mentally ill. ... I see that you do not deny being uninterested in science. ... There is a bell at the origin of A that will ring if light ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... I see that you do not deny being uninterested in science. ... So what are my goals, ... There is a bell at the origin of A that will ring if light ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: transformation equations
    ... and you do not see the lies after lies after lies in what you say. ... But I'm not going to try to cure you. ... I see that you do not deny being mentally ill. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)