Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:54:55 +0200
Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
R0xyk.9103$JK3.818@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
If you cannot reply with one wimple word, then
don't bother replying.
The "wimple" was a fingerslip typo, but I think it looks
quite charming, and perhaps more appropriate than what
I had intended, so I'm not going to correct it :-)
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- From: xxein
- Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- References:
- Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- Prev by Date: Re: Crank taxonomy
- Next by Date: Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
- Previous by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- Next by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|