Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.

Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
Spaceman <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
WZ6dnaDcLZ-FElfVnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
Spaceman <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
79ednVsecZjaFVfVnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
Spaceman <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
T8idnSGfLOsyGFfVnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
Spaceman <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Ea2dnRMOR8xdHFfVnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
PD wrote:
On Sep 12, 12:25 am, "Spaceman"
<space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In short simple terms.

Both twins are the same revolutions of Earth with reference
to the Sun old.
The Entire Universe agrees that both twins have "existed"
the same amount of natural Universal time.

Only a relativist fool would argue with the universe that
says the twins are the same age.
The same fools also never learned how a clock works
nor what a clock actually does to abstract time from motion
in the 3D universe.
It simply counts the motion.
:)

What really happened?
The human created clocks malfunctioned.
There will never be "time travel" as long as you
can not change the entire Universe motion speed
itself at will.

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman

Spaceman thinks that physical time is based on the number of
revolutions of the earth, because that's the way it was done
for centuries, and he has no idea why anyone would have
changed their mind about that, and even if they did he thinks
it's a terrible idea, and anyone that doesn't agree with him
on the matter is a loser.

PD thinks that clocks rule the Universe instead of the universe
ruling the clocks.
PD thinks a human invention has physical force over all the
planets in motion and such an invention is more "real" than
billions and billions of planets and stars and galaxies etc..
LOL
:)

Here you go - just what I was trying to explain to PD
as well.

Yes, all these billions of planets form billions of natural
clocks that are and remain synchronized with the stay
at home twin's clock.
The returning traveling twin counts the same number of
rotations and orbits of these planets as the stay at home
twin, but if the Traveling Clock is Malfunctioning, then
each rotation or orbit will count a smaller number of
Malfunctioning-Travel-Clock-Seconds, don't you agree?

No,
The clock is not counting the planets motion.

The clocks counts seconds.

Wrong!
The clocks count motion of a mass and "abstract" a second
from a certain number of counts.


The earth clock counts earth-seconds

Wrong again.
The Earth does not count anything.

I didn't say anuthing about what earth counts.
I said:
The earth clock counts earth-seconds.

[snip]

The malfunctioning-travel-clock counts malfunctioning-travel-clock
seconds.
Do you agree?

No, of course not.

You are
| James M Driscoll Jr
| Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
| Spaceman

You say that the clock malfunctions.
But the clock counts something and call it
malfunctioning-travel-clock-seconds.

Again you are a twisting fool,

The clock that stays on earth with the twin who
stays on earth, has a hand that goes tick tick tick...
We call the number of ticks between two events
"earth-clock-seconds".

The malfunctioning-travel-clock that goes with the
travelling twin, has a hand that goes tick tick tick...
We call the number of ticks between two events
"malfunctioning-travel-clock-seconds".

The clock that is malfunctioning is not "tick tick ticking"
at the same rate as the clock that is not malfuntioning
because that proper operation of a clock is to not tick
at a different rate at all.
Why don't you get how clocks work Dirk?
They are very simple machines really.
What don't you get about the fact that is a clock
is designed to tick at one rate, but ticks at a different
rate, then it is simply malfunctioning?
Sheesh.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Circular motion in SR
    ... slower than an identical clock on earth. ... precisely also why the traveling twin comes back younger. ... That is precisely the misconception that the twin puzzle is aimed to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Time dilation
    ... an Earth clock as it leaves Earth, travels to a point a fixed distance, ... With telemetry each tick could be uniquely identified. ... The Earth observer measures the time for the 2 way trip as ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: There is a name for what is wrong with Relativists.
    ... the original twin experment. ... The twin B accelerates away from the Earth, obtains 0.6 c wrt the Earth, ... clocks measure the lengths of the worldlines on ... You can only compare the clock readings when the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
    ... aiming to get back to earth. ... A will age faster than twin B, and twin B will age faster than twin ... Time dilation says A should see B younger and B should see A younger. ... they each would observe the other one's *distant* clock ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
    ... the traveling twin count for the trip? ... However, the number of revolutions of the Earth does not, and should ... determine the time as measured on either twin's clock. ... standard in use today, though not the standard of 300 BC. ...
    (sci.physics)