Re: transformation equations

doug wrote:
Spaceman wrote:

doug wrote:

I have patiently pointed out your mistakes and misconceptions
and have encouraged you to take advantage of the world of
information that is available for you to study to improve
your understanding of math and science.


You have done no such thing.
You are a lying sack of dingleberry ***.

You really do seem to hate having your mistakes pointed out.

Actually I don't mind such, and if you had a clue about me
you would know that, but since you have never pointed out
a mistake I made, you have no clue about what I do when
such is done.


I and others pointed out your clock misunderstandings.

No,
You have pointed out your own misunderstandings of a
clocks function to support your multiple standards joke
in science.


I and others pointed out your misunderstanding about terms
like resonance width.

No,
You have proven you have no clue what resonance means
at all.


I and others pointed out your misunderstands of optical
resonance.

Again you proved you simply have no clue what a resonance
is, nor what it means at all.


There are more but this is enough to prove you are wrong
on the statement above as well.

You have done nothing still.
You think you have but it is only because you can not understand
the most simple proof of you being wrong and also being ignorant
at the same time.
You still have not found out what a resonance is nor what it means.
You have no clue what a clock does to measure time.
You have no clue about the history of time nor how it was invented
for science.
And of course you have proven your best argument consists of
the word no without any actual physics involved.


I have not said all of math and science is wrong.

If you start by saying that the math sign conventions are
wrong, then none of the science derivations can be done.

I have not said the conventions of the signs are wrong.
I stated you don't seem to understand how to use them.
As I stated. you have no clue that a negative is simply
a positive in the other direction.


They are backing you up so that your back is to the wall and
you are looking into the face of your mistakes.

No,
Measurement systems that use single standards back me
up 100% and produce not even one single paradox in any
explanation of physics.
Your religion is full or paradox laden bull***.


I use real measurements.

No you don't moron.
You use a multiple standard for measurements.
You use rubber rulers and malfunctioning clocks.
As I said.
You do not have the slightest clue about "measuring" things.
You are nothing but a stupid ass brainwashed dingleberry
that has more lies coming out of your mouth than all the cows
in the world can ***, and the crap you spew smells just as
bad also.
Screw off dingleberry lying sack of crap.
1 second of light proves you are so wrong it is sad you
can not even grasp such.
So ..
What job have you done that has to do with physics?
Nothing huh?
Figures.





.

Quantcast