Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
- From: The TimeLord <math-n-physics-not@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:16:49 -0500
Am Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:04:19 -0700 schrieb RichD <r_delaney2001@xxxxxxxxx>
in 5a32f3de-01ef-490a-870c-d6b578e7d732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
At the center of a black hole, we supposedly find a singularity, a point
of infinite density. Does that not violate the position-momentum
uncertainty principle, shouldn't we expect some 'fuzzyness' in the
location?
Let's take a careful look at that. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
is
del(E)*del(t) >= hbar/2 = h/(2*pi)/2
Since the black hole itself is not moving with respect to the galaxy, we
can say
del(E) = del(m) * c^2
Since the black hole must be contained within itself, we can say that
del(t) * c <= del(Rs) = 2*G/c^2 * del(m)
Putting this together we get
(del(m) * c^2) * (2*G/c^2 * del(m)) >= hbar/2
or
del(m) >= sqrt(hbar/(4*G*c))
Plugging in values we get
del(m) >= 3.63*10^-17 kg
or roughly 22 billion nuclear particles (of about a proton mass).
Since the lightest black holes that we know of are on the order of a solar
mass, the uncertainty in the mass of a black hole from the HUP is 1 part
in 10^47. So even though there is some fuzziness to a black hole,
practically speaking, it's of no concern.
Side note: This also shows why all those concerns about LHC are crap and
black holes can not result in the LHC.
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- oops; was Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
- From: The TimeLord
- oops; was Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
- References:
- Heisenberg vs. Einstein
- From: RichD
- Heisenberg vs. Einstein
- Prev by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Next by Date: Re: transformation equations
- Previous by thread: Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
- Next by thread: oops; was Re: Heisenberg vs. Einstein
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|