The "malfunctioning" clock theory

Spaceman "explains" every relativistic experimental claim by asserting
that "the clock malfunctioned." How does he know that?

His only "proof" is that the moving clock ran slower than the
stationary clock. So, what's his point?

His point is that everybody should know that time is absolute, and if
the rate of a clock changes, it must have malfunctioned.

In other words, the proof that time is not relative is the "fact"
known to James Driscoll that time is absolute. How does he know? He
just knows, and that is all YOU have to know.

Curiously, however, every attempt to prove relativity false by
measurement is afflicted with malfunctioning clocks. Why are all
these clocks malfunctioning? Is it something in the mechanism? What
about cosmic clocks, such as unstable cosmic ray particles? What
about biological clocks, such as the aging of our bodies? It seems,
according to Spaceman, all clocks malfunction in the same way every
time.

If ALL clocks of any description "malfunction" in the same way EVERY
time they are measured, is that properly called a malfunction, or is
it a law of nature?

You decide.

Uncle Ben


.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast