sci.physics.relativity
- Gravity waves, energy and momentum,
Edward Green
- Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum, Androcles
- "Gravity", Loc
- I have got an idea!,
lundslaktare
- Re: I have got an idea!, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: I have got an idea!, harry
- Re: I have got an idea!, PD
- Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations, rbwinn
- Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.,
Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG., Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- yet another gedanken experiment: rfc,
funkenstein
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc,
dlzc
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc,
funkenstein
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc, funkenstein
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc,
funkenstein
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc,
PD
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc, funkenstein
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc, Edward Green
- Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc,
dlzc
- statistical mechanics, Norm
- Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?,
lundslaktare
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?,
harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dono
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Hayek
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dono
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Hayek
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dono
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Hayek
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dono
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Hayek
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Hayek
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dono
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, strich . 9993
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, lundslaktare
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, harry
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Tom Roberts
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?,
zeehas
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?, Dono
- Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?,
harry
- "Communicating at Translight Velocities", Loc
- Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !,
Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Androcles
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !,
Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Tom Roberts
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, eric gisse
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dono
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dono
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dono
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dono
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dono
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, YBM
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dono
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, YBM
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, YBM
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, YBM
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, YBM
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Hayek
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, YBM
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !,
Tom Roberts
- what causes spin?,
holog
- Re: what causes spin?,
Igor
- Re: what causes spin?, holog
- Re: what causes spin?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: what causes spin?, maxwell
- Re: what causes spin?,
Igor
- Re: what causes spin?, Tom Roberts
- Re: what causes spin?,
holog
- Re: what causes spin?, holog
- Re: what causes spin?, George Hammond
- Re: what causes spin?,
John Park
- Re: what causes spin?,
Androcles
- Re: what causes spin?, dlzc
- Re: what causes spin?, Androcles
- Re: what causes spin?,
Androcles
- Re: what causes spin?,
PD
- Re: what causes spin?, holog
- Re: what causes spin?,
Igor
- Composition of velocities without light, fjmr
- The Missing Symbol.,
glird
- Re: The Missing Symbol., Dono
- Re: The Missing Symbol.,
eric gisse
- Re: The Missing Symbol.,
glird
- Re: The Missing Symbol., Dono
- Re: The Missing Symbol., eric gisse
- Re: The Missing Symbol.,
glird
- Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing, ny2292000
- THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE,
Stamenin
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE,
shuba
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE, Androcles
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE, Dono
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE, Stamenin
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE, eric gisse
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE,
shuba
- Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD,
Albert Zotkin
- Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD,
eric gisse
- Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD, Hayek
- Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD,
eric gisse
- "General Relativity Examined", Loc
- The Daylight Saving Time (DST) shuts down Usenet Google Newsgroups, Albert Zotkin
- Paradox negation iv,
bill
- Re: Paradox negation iv, harry
- Re: Paradox negation iv, bill
- Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman),
Albertito
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), Juan R.
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman),
dlzc
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), Hayek
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman),
Juan R.
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), dlzc
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), Juan R.
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), eric gisse
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), Juan R.
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), dlzc
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), Juan R.
- Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman), Dono
- Galilean transformation,
rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation,
eric gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation,
rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, eric gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation,
rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation,
YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation,
rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, eric gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation,
PD
- Re: Galilean transformation, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation,
eric gisse
- A highly heretical thought...,
Edward Green
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Androcles
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
John Polasek
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Androcles
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
John Polasek
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
Juan R.
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Juan R.
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Juan R.
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Tom Roberts
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Tom Roberts
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., RustyJames
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Albertito
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Tom Roberts
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Albertito
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., eric gisse
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Albertito
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Dono
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Albertito
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Albertito
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Dono
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Albertito
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Dono
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., RustyJames
- Re: new ad hominem by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Albertito
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Dono
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., eric gisse
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Dono
- Re: new ad hominem by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: new ad hominem by banned troll Dono, Dono
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., eric gisse
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Juan R.
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Juan R.
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
Tom Roberts
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
Androcles
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Juan R.
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Edward Green
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
Androcles
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
dlzc
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., dlzc
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought...,
harry
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Dono
- Re: A highly heretical thought..., Edward Green
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
cephalobus_alienus
- Re: The birth of General Relativity, Androcles
- "Is There a Force of Gravity?", Loc
- Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks,
Albert Zotkin
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Tom Roberts
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks,
Juan R.
- Message not available
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: new ad hominem by Dirk, Juan R.
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Juan R.
- Message not available
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Juan R.
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Juan R.
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Tom Roberts
- Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks, Juan R.
- Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Androcles
- Re: Proposal for group splitting :-),
dlzc
- Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), Golden California Girls
- Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), xxein
- Re: Proposal for group splitting :-), gaby de wilde
- Re: Geometría Cuántica, Albertito
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Eric Gisse
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Stamenin
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Stamenin
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Stamenin
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Stamenin
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Stamenin
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT,
Stamenin
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy,
xxein
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy,
RP
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy,
funkenstein
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: UPDATE: Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: 2nd UPDATE Physical meaning of entropy, Juan R.
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Edward Green
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Eric Gisse
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Koobee Wublee
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, eric gisse
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Edward Green
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
xxein
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Androcles
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Don Stockbauer
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Edward Green
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Don Stockbauer
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Edward Green
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Edward Green
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
eric gisse
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Tom Roberts
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, Tom Roberts
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation, RustyJames
- Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation,
eric gisse
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dono
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
Androcles
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Juan R.
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spirit of Truth
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Androcles
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Androcles
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
dlzc
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Eric Gisse
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, eric gisse
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, dlzc
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
PD
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Androcles
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, PD
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Uncle Ben
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, RustyJames
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Spaceman
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Alen
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one,
liketofindoutwhy
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, wugi
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Igor
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, harry
- Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one, Edward Green
- Re: confused with time dilation,
Androcles
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation,
zarmewa
- Re: confused with time dilation, harry
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Igor
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Igor
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, harry
- Re: confused with time dilation,
Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, zarmewa
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Eric Gisse
- Re: confused with time dilation, bz
- Re: confused with time dilation, Eric Gisse
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
- Re: confused with time dilation, harry
- Re: confused with time dilation, Androcles
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Uncle Ben
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: confused with time dilation, PD
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, Sue...
- Re: confused with time dilation, harry
- Re: confused with time dilation, Androcles
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, The TimeLord
- Re: confused with time dilation, Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, The TimeLord
- Re: confused with time dilation, Spaceman
- Re: confused with time dilation, Uncle Ben
- Re: confused with time dilation, PD
- Re: confused with time dilation, Sue...
- Re: confused with time dilation,
wugi
- Re: confused with time dilation,
Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, RustyJames
- Re: confused with time dilation,
Dono
- Re: confused with time dilation, xray4abc
- Re: The big bang, dlzc
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....,
PD
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., RustyJames
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....,
Edward Green
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., PD
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., Daryl McCullough
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., Edward Green
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., Igor
- Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition...., Igor
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Androcles
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Spaceman
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Dono
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
dlzc
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Igor
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Spaceman
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, harry
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Igor
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, dlzc
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Androcles
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Androcles
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Androcles
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, dlzc
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, dlzc
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Spaceman
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Sue...
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, PD
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll,
bill
- Re: Twin paradox negation lll, Igor
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Igor
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space,
The TimeLord
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space,
Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, The TimeLord
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, The TimeLord
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, The TimeLord
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, The TimeLord
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space,
Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space,
Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, The TimeLord
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Dono
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space,
John Polasek
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space,
Androcles
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, John Polasek
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Androcles
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, John Polasek
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space, Androcles
- Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space,
Androcles
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, Spaceman
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, The TimeLord
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?,
harry
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?,
Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, harry
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?,
Dr. Henri Wilson
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?,
John Polasek
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?,
Androcles
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, John Polasek
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, Androcles
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, John Polasek
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, Androcles
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, zarmewa
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, Androcles
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, John Polasek
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, Androcles
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?, John Polasek
- Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?,
Androcles
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Energy sets up the speed limit, BURT
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?, Hayek
- Re: a simple relativity question, funkenstein
- Re: a simple relativity question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: a simple relativity question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: a simple relativity question, Simple Simon
- Re: a simple relativity question, Simple Simon
- Re: a simple relativity question, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: a simple relativity question,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: a simple relativity question, PD
- Re: a simple relativity question,
harry
- Re: a simple relativity question,
Androcles
- Re: a simple relativity question, harry
- Re: a simple relativity question, Androcles
- Re: a simple relativity question, RustyJames
- Re: a simple relativity question, Spaceman
- Re: a simple relativity question,
Androcles
- Re: a simple relativity question,
Sue...
- Re: a simple relativity question, RustyJames
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: a simple relativity question, Bob May
- [errata] Re: a simple relativity question, The TimeLord
- Re: a simple relativity question,
YBM
- Re: a simple relativity question, rbwinn
- Re: a simple relativity question, YBM
- Re: a simple relativity question, rbwinn
- Re: a simple relativity question, YBM
- Re: a simple relativity question, rbwinn
- Re: a simple relativity question, YBM
- Re: a simple relativity question, rbwinn
- Re: a simple relativity question, YBM
- Re: a simple relativity question, rbwinn
- Re: If black holes have no hair...,
Igor
- Re: If black holes have no hair...,
Edward Green
- Re: If black holes have no hair..., Igor
- Re: If black holes have no hair..., Edward Green
- Re: If black holes have no hair...,
Edward Green
- Re: If black holes have no hair..., Eric Gisse
- Re: If black holes have no hair...,
PD
- Re: If black holes have no hair..., RustyJames
- Re: If black holes have no hair..., carlip-nospam
- Re: Which of the following statements is true..., Tom Roberts
- Re: THE SPEED RELATIONS OF THE LT AND GT, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23., Occipital
- Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23., Occipital
- Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23., shuba
- Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23., Paul B. Andersen
- Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23., Igor
- Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.,
funkenstein
- Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23., Ivan Gorelik
- Re: SP and QM experimenatlly broken, Androcles
- Re: SP and QM experimenatlly broken, Eric Gisse
- Re: Star Wars: Get ready to rumble.,
Simple Simon
- Re: Star Wars: Get ready to rumble., Simple Simon
- Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here., Simple Simon
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?,
Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?,
Edward Green
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Edward Green
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, RustyJames
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?,
Edward Green
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?,
Albert Zotkin
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Albert Zotkin
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Albert Zotkin
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: new lie by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Dono
- Re: new ad hominem by troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: New strawman and ad hominem by Ken, Juan R.
- Re: New strawman and ad hominem by Ken, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: new delusion by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, RustyJames
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Albert Zotkin
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: New nonsenses and attacks by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Dono
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time ?dilation?, carlip-nospam
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time ?dilation?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time ?dilation?, Dono
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Edward Green
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Juan R.
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Dono
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?, Eric Gisse
- Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?,
Albert Zotkin
- Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN,
Edward Green
- Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN, Tom Roberts
- Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN, Eric Gisse
- Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN,
Edward Green
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer,
RP
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer,
RP
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer, Golden California Girls
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer, RP
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer,
RP
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer, dlzc
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer,
George Hammond
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer,
Don Stockbauer
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer, George Hammond
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer,
RP
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer, RustyJames
- Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer,
Don Stockbauer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer, CENTRINO
- Re: The physical education., dlzc
- Re: The physical education.,
xxein
- Re: The physical education.,
dlzc
- Re: The physical education., socratus
- Re: The physical education., dlzc
- Re: The physical education., socratus
- Re: The physical education., gabydewilde
- Re: The physical education., Mike Benz
- Re: The physical education., Spaceman
- Re: The physical education., dlzc
- Re: The physical education., Androcles
- Re: The physical education., Spaceman
- Re: The physical education., Spaceman
- Re: The physical education., xxein
- Re: The physical education., Spaceman
- Re: The physical education., socratus
- Re: The physical education., xxein
- Re: The physical education., Spaceman
- Re: The physical education.,
dlzc
- Re: The Collider Contradict Relativity of Pound-Rebeka,
PD
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The Collider Contradict Relativity of Pound-Rebeka, Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Re: Gravity, Sue...
- Re: Gravity, dlzc
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Spaceman
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
xxein
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Spaceman
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, xxein
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Spaceman
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, xxein
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
xxein
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Simple Simon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Spaceman
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Simple Simon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Simple Simon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, harry
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, harry
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Simple Simon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Simple Simon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Simple Simon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Simple Simon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, vertvergon
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Edward Green
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Edward Green
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Edward Green
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, xxein
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames,
Dono
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames, Sue...
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
PD
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
- Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Androcles
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
- Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
- Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Igor
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
xxein
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, xxein
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, shuba
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Androcles
- Re: PD does not understand SR, xxein
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Androcles
- Re: PD does not understand SR, xxein
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Androcles
- Re: PD does not understand SR, xxein
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Androcles
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
glird
- Re: PD does not understand SR, bjones
- Re: PD does not understand SR,
Dono
- Re: PD does not understand SR, glird
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: PD does not understand SR, glird
- Re: PD does not understand SR, Dono
- Re: PD does not understand SR, PD
- Re: PD does not understand SR, counterpart
- Re: relativity and proton collisions, Paul Cardinale
- Re: relativity and proton collisions, dlzc
- Re: relativity and proton collisions, PD
- Re: relativity and proton collisions,
RP
- Re: relativity and proton collisions, Androcles
- Re: relativity and proton collisions, Eric Gisse
- Re: Question for Shuba, PD
- Re: Question for Shuba,
shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba,
Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba, Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba, Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba, Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba,
Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba,
glird
- Re: Question for Shuba,
Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba, Spaceman
- Re: Question for Shuba, Eric Gisse
- Re: Question for Shuba, Spaceman
- Re: Question for Shuba, Eric Gisse
- Re: Question for Shuba, Spaceman
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba, glird
- Re: Question for Shuba, Dono
- Re: Question for Shuba, glird
- Re: Question for Shuba, Dono
- Re: Question for Shuba, Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba, Dono
- Re: Question for Shuba, glird
- Re: Question for Shuba, Dono
- Re: Question for Shuba, shuba
- Re: Question for Shuba,
Spaceman
- Re: Question for Shuba, Uncle Ben
- Re: Question for Shuba,
Uncle Ben
- Re: "Is String Theory Justified?", vertvergon
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.,
barycenter
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Koobee Wublee
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Eric Gisse
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Koobee Wublee
- Message not available
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Eric Gisse
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Eric Gisse
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations., Eric Gisse
- Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Big bang and black hole., SolomonW
- Re: Big bang and black hole.,
dlzc
- Re: Big bang and black hole., glird
- Re: photodetectors and photoresistor, Darwin123
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.,
Hayek
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.,
Spirit of Truth
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT., Spaceman
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT., Spirit of Truth
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT., Spaceman
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT., Spirit of Truth
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT., Spirit of Truth
- Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.,
Spirit of Truth
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether",
Darwin123
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether",
dwhig265
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether", Androcles
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether", Koobee Wublee
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether", Androcles
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether",
dwhig265
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether", glird
- Re: "The Properties of the Aether", glird
- Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz,
Josef Matz
- Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz, Eric Gisse
- Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz, Jim Newman
- Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz, Darwin123
- Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz,
Josef Matz
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX,
rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, papa_rios
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, papa_rios
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, papa_rios
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, papa_rios
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, papa_rios
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, papa_rios
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Spaceman
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, doug
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Dono
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Dono
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Androcles
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Uncle Ben
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, doug
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, papa_rios
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Dono
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Jürgen Clade
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Hayek
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, doug
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, doug
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, doug
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, Eric Gisse
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, doug
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, rbwinn
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, YBM
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX, The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX,
rbwinn
- Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole, Eric Gisse
- Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole,
lunogled
- Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole, carlip-nospam
- Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole, Eric Gisse
- Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole,
lunogled
- Re: Light Accelerates, Hayek
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Light Accelerates,
John Polasek
- Re: Light Accelerates, Androcles
- Re: Light Accelerates, Hayek
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?,
Spaceman
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?,
disassembler
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Spaceman
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Erwin Moller
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Spaceman
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Erwin Moller
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Spaceman
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Erwin Moller
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Spaceman
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Erwin Moller
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Spaceman
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, RustyJames
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Spaceman
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Androcles
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Erwin Moller
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?,
disassembler
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?,
PD
- Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
Darwin123
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
disassembler
- Re: Does Light Propagates?, Darwin123
- Re: Does Light Propagates?, disassembler
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
disassembler
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
RP
- Re: Does Light Propagates?, counterpart
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
RP
- Re: Does Light Propagates?, counterpart
- Re: Does Light Propagates?, maxwell
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
Androcles
- Re: Does Light Propagates?, Darwin123
- Re: Does Light Propagates?,
Androcles
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, disassembler
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, bill
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, Androcles
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, Alen
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?,
dwhig265
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, Golden California Girls
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, Igor
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, papa_rios
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, Hayek
- Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?, PD
- Re: natural recession speed, dlzc
- Re: natural recession speed,
Hayek
- Re: natural recession speed, xxein
- Re: natural recession speed, xxein
- Re: "The Arrow of Time", Don Stockbauer
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, xxein
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Uncle Ben
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY,
Stamenin
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Stamenin
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Stamenin
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Stamenin
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Stamenin
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY,
Stamenin
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?,
PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?,
Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?,
Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?,
Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Androcles
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Androcles
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, bz
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, bz
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, bz
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, RustyJames
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, YBM
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, doug
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, papa_rios
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, doug
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Jerry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Jerry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Androcles
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Jerry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Jerry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Jerry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, PD
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, harry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Uncle Ben
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, shuba
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Jerry
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Eric Gisse
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?, Spaceman
- Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?,
Uncle Ben
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good,
strich . 9991
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good,
papa_rios
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, strich . 9991
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, papa_rios
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, strich . 9993
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, papa_rios
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, Strich.9
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, Strich.9
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, Strich.9
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good, papa_rios
- Re: Relativity is disproven for good,
papa_rios
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.,
papa_rios
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.,
Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., xxein
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., RustyJames
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Androcles
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., disassembler
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., disassembler
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., disassembler
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Androcles
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., harry
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.,
Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.,
Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge., Spaceman
- Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.,
Spaceman
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax",
Salmon Egg
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax",
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Androcles
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax", glird
- Re: "The Einstein Hoax",
The Ghost In The Machine
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "The Einstein Hoax", Loc
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, strich . 9993
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?,
PD
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?,
Spaceman
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, PD
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, strich . 9991
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, PD
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, strich . 9991
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, PD
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, strich . 9991
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, PD
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, strich . 9991
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, PD
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, strich . 9991
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, Strich.9
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, Strich.9
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, PD
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, Spaceman
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?,
Spaceman
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, Androcles
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Is there cheating in relativity?, Androcles
- Re: Crank taxonomy,
RustyJames
- Re: Crank taxonomy, RustyJames
- Re: Crank taxonomy,
PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy,
bjones
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy, bjones
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Spaceman
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Crank taxonomy, PD
- Re: Crank taxonomy,
bjones
- Re: Crank taxonomy, Androcles
- Re: ABOUT THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Salmon Egg
- Re: ABOUT THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH, Dirk Van de moortel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Test2 SPF,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Test2 SPF,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes, BURT
- Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes,
SolomonW
- Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes,
Edward Green
- Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes, Daryl McCullough
- Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes,
Edward Green
- Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes, guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The missing time NOT Stored?, harry
- Re: The missing time NOT Stored?, Spaceman
- Re: The missing time NOT Stored?,
Strich.9
- Re: The missing time NOT Stored?, The Draper family
- Message not available
- Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?, Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?, Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?, Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS, Dono
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS, doug
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS,
Igor
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS,
Dono
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS, Dono
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS, socratus
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS, Stamenin
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS,
Dono
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
Igor
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Dono
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
Igor
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
PD
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, PD
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
mathkills
- Message not available
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, doug
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, mathkills
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, PD
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, PD
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Strich.9
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Uncle Ben
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Uncle Ben
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, mathkills
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Androcles
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Sue...
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Uncle Ben
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, PD
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, The Draper family
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Eric Gisse
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Eric Gisse
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Eric Gisse
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, kenseto
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Spaceman's muddle, Spaceman
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.,
Dono
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll,
Juan R.
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll, Dono
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll, Juan R.
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll, Eric Gisse
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll, Juan R.
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll, Eric Gisse
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll, Juan R.
- Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez is the "chief editor"- delusion reaches the maximum, Dono
- Re: new ad hominem and lies by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez delusion goes over the top - opens his personal "physics" journal, Dono
- Re: new lie by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll,
Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.,
PD
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., fifo
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.,
Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., The Draper family
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., PD
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., PD
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., PD
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: new ad hominem and lies by Ken, Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Dono
- Re: new lies and ad hominem by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works", Dono
- Re: Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works", strich . 9993
- Re: Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works", Dono
- Re: The truth behind Dono obsesion, Juan R.
- Juanshito is still the same deluded old fart, Dono
- Re: new lie by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Juanshito Alvarez Gonzale STILL heavily deluded, Dono
- Re: new lie by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Dirtbag Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez persists in his delusions, Dono
- Re: new lie by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works", strich . 9991
- Re: new lies and ad hominem by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., strich . 9991
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: new lies and ad hominem by crackpot Eric Gisse, Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., PD
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez persists in his delusions, Dono
- Re: Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez persists in his delusions, iqgoogol
- Re: new lie by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- JuanSHITO Alvarez Gonzalez still trying to attract attention to himself, Dono
- Re: new ad hominem and lies by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: JuanSHITO Alvarez Gonzalez still trying to attract attention to himself, Ken S. Tucker
- Re: new nonsense by Ken, Juan R.
- Self-publishing isn't publishing, Juanshito, Dono
- Re: new lie by banned troll Dono, Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., strich . 9991
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., strich . 9993
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., strich . 9991
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., strich . 9991
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., strich . 9991
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep., Juan R.
- Re: MMX Solution for Sale, PD
- Re: MMX Solution for Sale, doug
- Re: MMX Solution for Sale, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: MMX Solution for Sale, Eric Gisse
- Re: transformation equations,
PD
- Re: transformation equations,
rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations, PD
- Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations, Eric Gisse
- Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations, PD
- Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations, PD
- Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations, The Draper family
- Re: transformation equations, PD
- Re: transformation equations, xxein
- Re: transformation equations, Androcles
- Re: transformation equations, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations, The Draper family
- Re: transformation equations, rbwinn
- Re: transformation equations,
rbwinn
- Re: Now, about this metric thingie..., Edward Green
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Now, about this metric thingie..., Tom Roberts
- Re: Now, about this metric thingie..., Edward Green
- Re: Now, about this metric thingie..., The TimeLord
- Re: Now, about this metric thingie..., The TimeLord
- Re: Now, about this metric thingie..., The TimeLord
- Re: Now, about this metric thingie..., The TimeLord
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?,
shuba
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?,
Dono
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Spaceman
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Dono
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Spaceman
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Dono
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Spaceman
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Dono
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Spaceman
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Strich.9
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Dono
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, strich . 9993
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Dono
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Spaceman
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Spaceman
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?, Spaceman
- Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?,
Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9992
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Darwin123
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Strich.9
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Darwin123
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Darwin123
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Darwin123
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
Dono
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, OG
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, OG
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, OG
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, OG
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, OG
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, OG
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, gabydewilde
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, gabydewilde
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, gabydewilde
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, The Draper family
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, The Draper family
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, gabydewilde
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, gabydewilde
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Spaceman
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, YBM
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, gabydewilde
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, glird
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9991
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Dono
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, The Draper family
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, The Draper family
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, strich . 9993
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
PD
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, Darwin123
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity,
glird
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity, The Draper family
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux),
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux),
harry
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), harry
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux),
xxein
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), xxein
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), xxein
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), xxein
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), xxein
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux),
harry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux), ron_aikas
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited, shayiam
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The speed of gravity revisited, Tom Van Flandern
- Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems., Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Thomas Heger
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.,
Igor
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.,
Daniel Needles
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Igor
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Alen
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Alen
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Alen
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Alen
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., PD
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Alen
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Eric Gisse
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.,
Daniel Needles
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.,
PD
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., Daniel Needles
- Re: Gravitons verses general relativity., zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity., doug
- Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity., strich . 9992
- Message not available
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.,
PD
- Message not available
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., PD
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9992
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., PD
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9991
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., PD
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9992
- Message not available
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., Spaceman
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., PD
- Message not available
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., doug
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., doug
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9991
- Message not available
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., doug
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9993
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.,
PD
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9992
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.,
strich . 9992
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., PD
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9991
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., PD
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., strich . 9992
- Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity., PD
- Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance, Martin Hogbin
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, RustyJames
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, RustyJames
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Androcles
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Androcles
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
- Message not available
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Message not available
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Message not available
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity,
John Kennaugh
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Eric Gisse
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, RustyJames
- Message not available
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, doug
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, RustyJames
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity,
The Draper family
- Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity, John Kennaugh
Loading
