sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: YBM
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: YBM
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: YBM
• Re: Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: YBM
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: Edward Green
• Gravity waves, energy and momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: YBM
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• "Gravity"
  • From: Loc
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: PD
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: I have got an idea!
  • From: PD
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: PD
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I have got an idea!
  • From: harry
• Re: new ad hominem by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: I have got an idea!
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• I have got an idea!
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dono
• Galilean transformation equations and Lorentz equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Dono
• Physics Aptitude Test for the EPG.
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: YBM
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dono
• yet another gedanken experiment: rfc
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Dono
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Dono
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Albertito
• Re: 2nd UPDATE Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new ad hominem by banned troll Dono
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dono
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: new ad hominem by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: zeehas
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Jürgen Clade
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Albertito
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: harry
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Hayek
• statistical mechanics
  • From: Norm
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: holog
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: holog
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: holog
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Missing Symbol.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The Missing Symbol.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: harry
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Missing Symbol.
  • From: glird
• Lorentz Ether Theory, What to read?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: PD
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Bob May
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Albertito
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: maxwell
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Loc
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: John Park
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: dlzc
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: holog
• Re: Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: The Missing Symbol.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: rbwinn
• Never say absolute on sci.physics.relativity !
  • From: Hayek
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: what causes spin?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Edward Green
• what causes spin?
  • From: holog
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: The Missing Symbol.
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: YBM
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Composition of velocities without light
  • From: fjmr
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: shuba
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• The Missing Symbol.
  • From: glird
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Dono
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Dono
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Dono
• Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: greysky
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing
  • From: Androcles
• Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: UPDATE: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: new ad hominem by Dirk
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Hayek
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Paradox negation iv
  • From: bill
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Dono
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: gaby de wilde
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• THE PRINCIPLE OF THE EQUIVALENCE
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: glird
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Loc
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: YBM
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Dono
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• The Daylight Saving Time (DST) shuts down Usenet Google Newsgroups
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Paradox negation iv
  • From: harry
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Hayek
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Androcles
• Paradox negation iv
  • From: bill
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Geometría Cuántica
  • From: Albertito
• Misinformation Concerning Cosmology and Relativity (by Chris Hillman)
  • From: Albertito
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Galilean transformation
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Androcles
• A highly heretical thought...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Loc
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: cephalobus_alienus
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: harry
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Dono
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: xxein
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: dlzc
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Loc
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: RP
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Hi experts, I can't understand what proper time and coordinate time are, can you help?, thanks
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: xxein
• Proposal for group splitting :-)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: xxein
• Re: ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Geometría Cuántica
  • From: Q_Gravity
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: no need of aikido to bring einstein down
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: liketofindoutwhy
• ABOUT THE LT AND GT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Physical meaning of entropy
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: glird
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: dlzc
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: bz
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: liketofindoutwhy
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: doug
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Edward Green
• Grokking the Einstein Equation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Igor
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Igor
• Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Igor
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Igor
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: liketofindoutwhy
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: glird
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: wugi
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: liketofindoutwhy
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: liketofindoutwhy
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: dlzc
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: wugi
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New strawman and ad hominem by Ken
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: charge and mass excert forces on each other
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: liketofindoutwhy
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: dlzc
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Androcles
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Androcles
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Loc
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Alen
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new ad hominem by troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: New strawman and ad hominem by Ken
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dono
• Re: twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: Dono
• twin paradox, but a symmetric one
  • From: liketofindoutwhy
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: xxein
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: Igor
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Igor
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Igor
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: PD
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Their froth of General Relativity
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: harry
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dono
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: confused with time dilation
  • From: Androcles
• confused with time dilation
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: The big bang
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: PD
• "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
  • From: Loc
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• The big bang
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lie by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new delusion by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: dlzc
• Does a 2-D surface embedded in 3-space meet the definition....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Igor
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Igor
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Which of the following statements is true...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Loc
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: New nonsenses and attacks by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: harry
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RichD
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Dr. Henri Wilson.>
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: doug
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• The LHC needs two MIG-23. What kind of death do you prefer?
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Twin paradox negation lll
  • From: bill
• Re: Energy sets up the speed limit
  • From: BURT
• translation and rotation in Euclidean space
  • From: athan
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: xxein
• How long does sunlight take to reach the earth?
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Energy sets up the speed limit
  • From: BURT
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time ?dilation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time ?dilation?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• [errata] Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: wugi
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time ?dilation?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Dono
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: glird
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: glird
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: socratus
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: RP
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: harry
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Dono
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Dono
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: harry
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: glird
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: PD
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: PD
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: THE SPEED RELATIONS OF THE LT AND GT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: SP and QM experimenatlly broken
  • From: ilper
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: Hayek
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: a simple relativity question
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: George Hammond
• a simple relativity question
  • From: RichD
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Relativistic Problems for the 21st Century: Concise refutation of SR
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: xxein
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Relativistic Problems for the 21st Century: Concise refutation of SR
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: dedanoe's 2nd knol
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: Igor
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: Igor
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If black holes have no hair...
  • From: Igor
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• If black holes have no hair...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Edward Green
• Which of the following statements is true...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Multidimensional manifolds
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE SPEED RELATIONS OF THE LT AND GT
  • From: shuba
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SP and QM experimenatlly broken
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Hayek
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• They us Satire and Evilness at The Collider !!!
  • From: Occipital
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Tej
• The Collider is not Skeptical enough !
  • From: Occipital
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: Occipital
• Re: That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: Occipital
• Re: SP and QM experimenatlly broken
  • From: Androcles
• That damned LHC needs two MIG-23.
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• SP and QM experimenatlly broken
  • From: ilper
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: dlzc
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Dono
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: RP
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Edward Green
• Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: CENTRINO
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: glird
• Re: Star Wars: Get ready to rumble.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Star Wars: Get ready to rumble.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Star Wars: Get ready to rumble.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: GR to Newton. Unable to get there from here.
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: RP
• Re: Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: gabydewilde
• "Causality"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• The joint effect of gravitational redshift and gravitational time dilation?
  • From: Edward Green
• So that's how light sabers work!
  • From: Edward Green
• Some idiot's guide questions about RIEMANN
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: Mike Benz
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Dark energy and Crookes Radiometer
  • From: CENTRINO
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• All solution manuals you want are here
  • From: getsolution1
• manual solution solution manual study guide
  • From: getsolution1
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Collider Contradict Relativity of Pound-Rebeka
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: doug
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: Darwin123
• Fake Australian idiot calls himself barycenter now
  • From: Dono
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: xxein
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: dlzc
• The physical education.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: barycenter
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: The Collider Contradict Relativity of Pound-Rebeka
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• The Collider Contradict Relativity of Pound-Rebeka
  • From: barycenter
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: counterpart
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: glird
• Gravity
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: News: Einstein's relativity survives neutrino test
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: News: Einstein's relativity survives neutrino test
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: RP
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Question for Shuba
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• News: Einstein's relativity survives neutrino test
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: harry
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: harry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: RP
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: xxein
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Simple Simon
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Lorentz transforms for rotating frames
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: bz
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: PD does not understand SR
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• PD does not understand SR
  • From: bjones
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: relativity and proton collisions
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: bz
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• relativity and proton collisions
  • From: dseppala
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Androcles
• Question for Shuba
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Marx was scientific critics of pure ökonomy.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: bz
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Relativistic Problems for the 21st Century: Concise refutation of SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativistic Problems for the 21st Century: Concise refutation of SR
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativistic Problems for the 21st Century: Concise refutation of SR
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Jerry
• Relativistic Problems for the 21st Century: Concise refutation of SR
  • From: Albert Zotkin
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Marx was scientific critics of pure ökonomy.
  • From: Meenken
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: harry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: YBM
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Classification of the Einstein field equations.
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Big bang and black hole.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Big bang and black hole.
  • From: glird
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: PD
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big bang and black hole.
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: papa_rios
• "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Big bang and black hole.
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Big bang and black hole.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole
  • From: lunogled
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: Spirit of Truth
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: ron_aikas
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: bjones
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Demand that Obama release his college records! Where is the media?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Demand that Obama release his college records! Where is the media?
  • From: Micky
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Are We the Ripples in The Space-Time Continuum???
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Are We the Ripples in The Space-Time Continuum???
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light Accelerates
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Light Accelerates
  • From: Hayek
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Demand that Obama release his college records! Where is the media?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: glird
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: glird
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Gravity-light link & universe architecture
  • From: Ajmal
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: photodetectors and photoresistor
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• photodetectors and photoresistor
  • From: swapna
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: D*rk vd M banned at Thuring Contest.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: counterpart
• Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Which instizutes have disproven Nimtz
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: counterpart
• Re: D*rk vd M banned at Thuring Contest.
  • From: YBM
• Re: D*rk vd M banned at Thuring Contest.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: D*rk vd M banned at Thuring Contest.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Marx was scientific critics of pure ökonomy.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Hawking radiation from a Kerr Black hole
  • From: lunogled
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: RP
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: RP
• Re: Marx was scientific critics of pure ökonomy.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Marx was scientific critics of pure ökonomy.
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Light Accelerates
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Light Accelerates
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light Accelerates
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Are We the Ripples in The Space-Time Continuum???
  • From: Igor
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does THE NEUTRINO have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Is Space-Time a Continuum in Reality?
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: disassembler
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Are We the Ripples in The Space-Time Continuum???
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Does Light Propagates?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Alen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Does Light Propagates?
  • From: disassembler
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: D*rk vd M banned at Thuring Contest.
  • From: disassembler
• Re: D*rk vd M banned at Thuring Contest.
  • From: YBM
• The Collider is Inconsistent
  • From: disassembler
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Ecir
• Fermilab and symmetry breaking
  • From: socratus
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• D*rk vd M banned at Thuring Contest.
  • From: Hayek
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: harry
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The conception “acceleration”.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: bill
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Ok, so how do YOU get the world to acknowledge YOUR theories?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: natural recession speed
  • From: xxein
• Re: natural recession speed
  • From: xxein
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: natural recession speed
  • From: Hayek
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: natural recession speed
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: bjones
• No need to hunt for jobs. Start earning right now. Guaranteed.
  • From: madhu
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: glird
• natural recession speed
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does THE NEUTRINO have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does THE NEUTRINO have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Does THE NEUTRINO have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Does THE NEUTRINO have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: new nonsense by Ken
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new ad hominem and lies by Ken
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: xxein
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• THE LENGTH IS NOT SHORTENING IN EINSTEIN RELATIVITY
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: JuanSHITO Alvarez Gonzalez still trying to attract attention to himself
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: new ad hominem and lies by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• JuanSHITO Alvarez Gonzalez still trying to attract attention to himself
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Time is shown to be a constant
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: sam
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: papa_rios
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: OG
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Relativity is disproven for good
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: papa_rios
• The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity = Stupidity 103
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: Does photon have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: harry
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: PD
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: new lie by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Does photon have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: gabydewilde
• Does photon have finite or zero rest mass?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: PD
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez persists in his delusions
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: A simple derivation of the relativistic formula for the addition of velocities
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez persists in his delusions
  • From: Dono
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lie by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lie by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Is there cheating in relativity?
  • From: sam
• Dirtbag Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez persists in his delusions
  • From: Dono
• Re: new lie by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: OG
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Juanshito Alvarez Gonzale STILL heavily deluded
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: new lie by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: glird
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Self-publishing isn't publishing, Juanshito
  • From: Dono
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Crank taxonomy
  • From: bjones
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Juanshito is still the same deluded old fart
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works"
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: PD
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lies and ad hominem by crackpot Eric Gisse
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The truth behind Dono obsesion
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lies and ad hominem by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Matter and “dark matter"
  • From: socratus
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: xxein
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works"
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works"
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Why relativists don't understand Einstein's 1905 mathematics.
  • From: glird
• Juanshito still hallucinating about publishing his "works"
  • From: Dono
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Alen
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple derivation of the relativistic formula for the addition of velocities
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: OG
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: new lies and ad hominem by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: HAARP
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: glird
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: HAARP
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: The missing time NOT Stored?
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ABOUT THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: ABOUT THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Salmon Egg
• Re: HAARP
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• ABOUT THE RELATIVITY OF THE LENGTH
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: glird
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: mathkills
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Still No Mathematical Elegance after 100 Years!!!
  • From: Shubee
• So much discussions and Null Result ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: HAARP
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Crests of Gravity !!!
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: The missing time NOT Stored?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Still No Mathematical Elegance after 100 Years!!!
  • From: Don Stockbauer
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: OG
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes
  • From: SolomonW
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: new lie by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Fallen Objects in Black Holes
  • From: BURT
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Clocks and proper time in Special relativity
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Still No Mathematical Elegance after 100 Years!!!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: xxein
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Test2 SPF
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The missing time NOT Stored?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: PD
• Re: The missing time NOT Stored?
  • From: harry
• Fallen Objects in Black Holes
  • From: fifo
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: fifo
• Still No Mathematical Elegance after 100 Years!!!
  • From: fifo
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: PD
• The missing time NOT Stored?
  • From: fifo
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Juanshito Gonzalez Alvarez delusion goes over the top - opens his personal "physics" journal
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: new ad hominem and lies by banned troll Dono
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Sue...
• Juanshito Alvarez Gonzalez is the "chief editor"- delusion reaches the maximum
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: OG
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: mathkills
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: socratus
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Igor
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Igor
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: mathkills
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Density Profiles etc.
  • From: peedah
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: doug
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: shayiam
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Dono
• Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll
  • From: Dono
• ABOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NEWTON AND EINSTEIN IN PHYSICS
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: new flamme by Dono the banned troll
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Spaceman's muddle
  • From: Spaceman
• Spaceman's muddle
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: MMX Solution for Sale
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: MMX Solution for Sale
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Dono
• Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Daniel Needles
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Relativists keep turning back the odometers of time.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: MMX Solution for Sale
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: MMX Solution for Sale
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Dono
• Re: MMX Solution for Sale
  • From: Dono
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• MMX Solution for Sale
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: transformation equations
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• They admit, no mathematical beauty!
  • From: semilog
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Now, about this metric thingie...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: harry
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: harry
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: OG
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HAARP
  • From: funkenstein
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation really true?
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: doug
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Igor
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: Dono
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Doppler shift vs second postulate (redux)
  • From: xxein
• Re: The speed of gravity revisited
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: doug
• Re: HAARP
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The equations of STR are not applicable in all inertial systems.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ABOUT THE SPEEDS FORMULAS OBTAINED BY THE USE OF THE GT AND LT
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Help with rate problem using relativity spacetime concepts
  • From: xxein
• Re: Gravitons verses general relativity.
  • From: xxein
• Re: This Group would be Quite Boring without Relativist Stupidity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: RustyJames
• Re: Proof that Relativists Do Not Understand Relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Lines Refute Light Speed Invariance
  • From: delta-T
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: John Kennaugh