Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 6, 3:05 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
<juanREM...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Draper family wrote on Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:28:48 -0500:
in article pan.2008.10.04.08.40...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Juan R.
González-Álvarez at juanREM...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 10/4/08
3:36 AM:
PD wrote on Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:18:53 -0700:
On Oct 2, 10:10 am, "Juan R." González-Álvarez
<juanREM...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To serve better to research community, students, and general people,
and to fill own needs, the Center launches the new Canonical Science
Reports; Center's dedicated 'living' journal for rapid and effective
dissemination of last knowledge in this unified theory.
Self-publication is always a viable option for frustrated authors who
are tired of being rejected by publishers.
As usual you never solve problems asked, you just avoid them and start
lies.
Two comments
- I was not aware that I was under obligation to solve problems posed by
you, nor subject to criticism for failure to do so.
You are under the ethical obligation, once you start to attack to the
person who choose one solution to the problems.
Nonsense. Wherever did you make up such a rule of conduct?
Yes, I know that you would like it a whole lot better if the world
operated the way you want it to.
- I'm not aware of
any lie in the statement that I made.
Ok, in his above exact writing, it is somewhat in the middle between a
lie and an insult.
Meaning neither one? Where is the lie?
But I remark again next point: nobody in moderated
sci.physics.foundations is doing the kind of scary comments, insults, and
insinuations are being done by the only three persons replying here. And
one is a banned troll and the other a well-known crackpot.
And I remark that the fact that only three people have chosen to reply
to your post here should also tell you something about the value of
what it is you are posting. That may also have bearing on the
perceived value of what it is you are posting elsewhere. Which in turn
relates to the comment I made about self-publication always being an
option for an author who sees value in his own work where others do
not.
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- References:
- Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: PD
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: The Draper family
- Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- From: Juan R.
- Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- Prev by Date: Re: Spaceman's muddle
- Next by Date: Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- Previous by thread: Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- Next by thread: Re: Announcement of new Can. Sci. Rep.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|