Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: rbwinn <rbwinn3@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 9, 8:06�pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 9, 5:20�pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
You argue like it matters what you say. Why is that?
I never argue, Eric. If scientists want to believe in a length
contraction, I believe they should have the right to believe in a
length contraction.
Robert B. Winn
.
- References:
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: doug
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: rbwinn
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: Is "malfunctioning" absolute or relative?
- Next by Date: Re: new ad hominem and lies by Ken
- Previous by thread: Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|